Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:1442 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
Table of Contents   
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 250-252
 

Percutaneous cystolithotomy in augmented bladders


1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Park Clinic, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Calcutta Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission28-Apr-2020
Date of Decision13-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance29-Sep-2020
Date of Web Publication12-Jul-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Uday Sankar Chatterjee
Park Clinic, 4, Gorky Terrace, Kolkata - 700 017, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_128_20

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Aims: Incidence and recurrence of bladder stone in augmented exstrophy bladder rate is high. So, recurrent open cystolithotomy is not a preferred procedure; particularly through scarred tissues, consequence of previous surgeries. Percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCL) is an old but standard procedure for retrieval of bladder stones in adults. We extrapolated PCCL for bladder stone in augmented bladders in children.
Patients and Methods: In three patients, we made suprapubic (SP) needle track with initial puncture (IP) needle under cystoscopic guidance. Following that laparoscopic cannula was placed through dilated SP track that was crafted with Alken's dilators and bladder stones were removed with grasper.
Results: On cystoscopy, we also observed the patches of skin tissues in native bladders. Continence and bladder capacity were not affected following PCCL.
Conclusion: PCCL in augmented bladder showed good outcome. High recurrence of bladder stone is possibly due to presence of keratin in dermal tissue; invaded mucosa in open bladder plate. It seems shaving or fulguration of those dermal elements during bladder reconstruction might decrease incidence of stone formation. However, we haven't attempted fulguration during PCCL.


Keywords: Augmentation, bladder stone, cystoscope, dermal tissue, exstrophy bladder, laparoscopic cannula


How to cite this article:
Chatterjee US, Chatterjee I. Percutaneous cystolithotomy in augmented bladders. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2021;26:250-2

How to cite this URL:
Chatterjee US, Chatterjee I. Percutaneous cystolithotomy in augmented bladders. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 30];26:250-2. Available from: https://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2021/26/4/250/321086





   Introduction Top


Lifetime prevalence of urinary stone is estimated to be around 3.8%.[1] Out of that, bladder stone has got least incidence, particularly in hygienic environments. However, the incidence of bladder stone in augmented exstrophy bladder [Figure 1] is around 15%–50% and recurrence rate is also high: which is around 39%.[2-4] It is thus exasperation, particularly after achievement of continent bladder of small children. In this situation, considering the incidence of recurrence, transurethral lithotripsy through narrow urethra is not chosen with an apprehension of spoil of reconstructed continent bladder neck.
Figure 1: Stone in augmented bladder

Click here to view


Percutaneous cystolithotomy (PCCL) is a standard procedure for retrieval of bladder stones in adult.[5] We did cystoscope-guided PCCL and used the laparoscopic cannula and grasper for removal of bladder stone.


   Patients and Methods Top


Three patients, two female and one male, aged 4–6 year [Table 1], were treated with this PCCL. All three patients had bladder neck reconstruction, pubic osteotomy minimal procedure,[6] and augmented ileal bladder for the reconstruction of exstrophy. All three patients were continent either with clean intermittent catheterization via naturalis or by normal void. They were not advised for regular bladder wash.
Table 1: Patients with stones profile

Click here to view


Under general anesthesia and in “frog position,” we did cystoscopy and identified stone. Size of stones was within 6–8 mm. Following that, puncture of the bladder at the suprapubic region was made using 18-G puncture needle [Figure 2]a under endoscopic guidance and guide wire was threaded through the lumen of that needle to place portion of guide wire in the bladder. Guide rod of Alken's dilator [Figure 2]b was then threaded on that guide wire and passed into the bladder through the ileal wall of the augmented bladder under endovision guidance. Following that, track for PCCL was made and dilated with Alken's dilator up to 30f [Figure 2]c, [Figure 3]a. Laparoscopic cannula was then pushed into bladder threading on Alkenes dilator [Figure 3]b. The stone was then grasped under guidance of cystoscope for removal [Figure 3]c. At the end, we did cystopanendoscopy to check residual stone or any residual stitches. During cystopanendoscopy, we found few dermal elements near the bladder neck and trigone.
Figure 2: Puncture with needle and guide wire is threaded (a). Guide rod is threaded over guide wire (b). Alken's telescopic dilators are threaded over guide rod (c)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Alken's telescopic dilators are threaded over guide rod (a). Laparoscopic cannula is threaded over Alken's dilators (b). Stone retrieved with grasper (c)

Click here to view


Few stitches were made to close the PCCL track and urethral catheter kept for 7 days.


   Results Top


No fistula was there in PCCL track. One patient had recurrence of stone after 3 years. Continence and bladder capacity were not affected following PCCL unlike open cystolithotomy.


   Discussion Top


Open cystolithotomy in an augmented bladder is not desirable for the apprehension of dehiscence of the abdominal wall or indolent fistula. Minimally invasive endoscopic procedure, i.e., PCCL, is preferable. In 1999, a boy of 13 years was treated by Talic[7] for prostatovesical calculus by the same procedure through the suprapubic tract. In the same year, Agrawal et al. described similar procedure[8] for vesical calculus in children. Following that, Salah et al.[9] also did PCCL for children. However, all those procedures were done for the stone of native bladder with the help of nephroscope.

Pediatric cystoscope, laparoscopic cannula, and graspers are available in most of pediatric surgical setup for endoscopic procedure. Only the Alken's dilator set, cost of which is around five thousand only, is necessary for this modified PCCL procedure, which might turn aside further investment for costlier equipments, i.e., nephroscope, LASER, etc. Eletrohydraulic/LASER is simpler and better alternative and may make the stone extraction simpler but dictates costlier investment.

In this modified PCCL, we have discussed the access of bladder cavity through gradual dilation with Alken's dilators.[10] However, access of the bladder through puncture with laparoscopic trocar–cannula [Figure 4]a under endoscopic guidance [Figure 4]b is also a possibility. PCCL with laparoscopic trocar–cannula was described by Barber et al.[11] and Khullar et al.[12] for retrieval of bladder stone and knotted feeding tube, respectively.
Figure 4: Direct puncture with laparoscopic trocar–cannula (a). Tip of trocar visible through mucosa (b)

Click here to view


Most authors claim that the urinary stasis, bacterial colonization, infection with urea-splitting organisms, retained mucus, and foreign bodies all can contribute to the formation of bladder stones[3],[4] in an augmented ileal bladder. However, incidence of bladder stones in orthotopic neo-ileal-bladder following radical cystectomy is not high compared to augmented exstrophy bladder and it is only around 7%[13] and that is not at all comparable to the incidence of bladder stones in augmented ileal bladder. Now, the question arises: why this outlandish higher incidence of stone in augmented bladder in exstrophy, compared to neobladder, when both ileal bladders have got similar milieu in their cavity! We found few dermal elements near neck and trigone during cystopanendoscopy at the end of PCCL. Those are due to migrated epidermal tissue in the bladder mucosa often seen in post neonatal bladder plate. Possibly prior invaded epidermal tissues were enclosed without shaving during bladder reconstruction. Shedding of insoluble keratin protein[14] from the dermal tissue in augmented bladder might be the nidus for bladder stone formation along with other factors and makes the incidence higher.


   Conclusions Top


This modified PCCL seems to be a simple minimal invasive procedure for the stones in augmented bladder, without further costly investment.

'Philosophically, nothing is new, and technically innovation is a mutation; sometimes might be a new colossal'

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Trinchieri A, Coppi F, Montanari E, Del Nero A, Zanetti G, Pisani E. Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol 2000;37:23-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Silver RI, Gros DA, Jeffs RD, Gearhart JP. Urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex. J Urol 1997;158:1322-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Schlomer BJ, Copp HL. Cumulative incidence of outcomes and urologic procedures after augmentation cystoplasty. J Pediatr Urol 2014;10:1043-50.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Palmer LS, Franco I, Kogan SJ, Reda E, Gill B, Levitt SB. Urolithiasis in children following augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol 1993;150:726-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nerli R, Kadeli V, Ghagane SC, Dixit N, Hiremath M. Asymptomatic multiple bladder stones treated by percutaneous cystolitholapaxy. Med Sur Urol 2017;6:187.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Chatterjee US. Pubic osteotomy minimal for abdominal wall closure in exstrophy bladder. J Pediatr Urol 2020;16:394-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Talic RF. Percutaneous suprapubic urethrolitholapaxy of a large native prostatic urethral stone. BJU Int 1999;83:724-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Agrawal MS, Aron M, Goyal J, Elhence IP, Asopa HS. Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotripsy for vesical calculi in children. J Endourol 1999;13:173-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Salah MA, Holman E, Khan AM, Toth C. Percutaneous cystolithotomy for pediatric endemic bladder stone: Experience with 155 cases from 2 developing countries. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1628-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Alken P. The telescope dilators. World J Urol 1985;3:7-10.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Barber TD, Dajusta D, Gargollo PC. Outpatient 'mini' percutaneous cystolithotomy following complex lower urinary tract reconstruction. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9;479-82.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Khullar S, Bera MK, Kundu AK, Pal DK. Successful management of auto knotted intravesical infant feeding tube by minimal invasive technique. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2012;17:174-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Tanaka R, Kitamura H, Takahasi A. Long – Term functional outcome and late complications of Struder's ileal neobladder. Jpn I Clin Oncol 2005;35:391-4.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Jou YC, Fang CY, Chen SY, Chen FH, Cheng MC, Shen CH, et al. Proteomic study of renal uric acid stone. Urology 2012;80:260-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,709 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Patients and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed112    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05