Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:137 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 98-101
 

High-resolution ultrasound study of morphological changes of the pylorus in the postoperative cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis


1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nilratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission16-Jan-2020
Date of Decision26-Apr-2020
Date of Acceptance21-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication04-Mar-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Dipak Ghosh
Orbit Sky View, 1/1A, Umakanta Sen Lane, Block-4, Flat-4B, Kolkata - 700 030, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_18_20

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Aims: The aim of this study was to find & compare the pyloric Canal Length (CL), Pyloric muscle thickness (MT) by using the High Resolution Ultrasonography (HRUS) in Preoperative & postoperative period (after Ramstedt Pyloromyotomy) for Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis (IHPS).
Methods: From January 2018 to June 2019, we have performed HRUS for 40 patients of clinically diagnosed cases of IHPS. & Ultrasonography machine: Phillips HD 7 machine & Alpinion E-CUBE with 3-12MHz linear probe, 3.5-5 MHz curvilinear probe and 5-7.5 MHz sector probe were used. The sonographic criteria for positive IHPS are Pyloric muscle thickness (MT) > 3 mm, pyloric Canal length (CL) >14 mm. Postoperative MT & CL at 2 month, 4 month & 6 month were determined and results were analysed with the preoperative pyloric parameters. Statistical analysis used: Mean and standard deviation of values were obtained by using Microsoft excel and statistical significance was analysed by regression study of grouped variables showing p – value by Microsoft excel.
Results: Pyloric parameters (MT & CL ) gradually attain normal values over months and 80 % of patients showed resolution of pyloric MT & CL values by 6 months. MT assessment shows statistical significance at six months scan ( p- value <0.05).
Conclusions: Serial postoperative HRUS in IHPS cases show gradual ( mostly by 6 months) resolution of pyloric parameters ( MT & CL ) to normal. MT appears to be a consistent parameter for serial assessment.


Keywords: High-resolution ultrasound pylorus, infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, postoperative pyloric morphology, ramstedt pyloromyotomy


How to cite this article:
Guria M, Ghosh D, Bisth J, Basu SP, Saha K. High-resolution ultrasound study of morphological changes of the pylorus in the postoperative cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2021;26:98-101

How to cite this URL:
Guria M, Ghosh D, Bisth J, Basu SP, Saha K. High-resolution ultrasound study of morphological changes of the pylorus in the postoperative cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 11];26:98-101. Available from: https://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2021/26/2/98/310653





   Introduction Top


Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is one of the most common causes of gastric outlet obstruction in infants, presenting mostly between 2 and 6 weeks of life. The condition is characterized by hypertrophy of pyloric antral wall muscle and mucosa and failure of pyloric canal to relax resulting in gastric outlet obstruction. The incidence is 1–4/1000 live births, although regional and community variation may occur. A recent history of projectile and nonbivilious vomiting which may be intermittent or with every feeding is the classical complaint. Clinical and biochemical findings such as dehydration, weight loss, visible gastric peristalsis with the features of dehydration, and hypokalemic hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis are common. High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) is the modality of choice when there is the clinical suspicion of IHPS. HRUS is noninvasive, does not have radiation hazards, and so has got definite advantage in children. HRUS also allows a dynamic study with the direct observation of pyloric canal morphology. Ramstedt pyloromyotomy, introduced in 1911, still remains the operative procedure of choice for the management of IHPS. This study aims to establish the role of HRUS as a first line of investigation in patients clinically presenting with IHPS and compare their pyloric parameters such as muscle thickness (MT) and canal length (CL) in the preoperative period and postoperative sequential follow-up after 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months.


   Materials and Methods Top


This study was conducted with the joint collaboration of the Department of Pediatric surgery and the Department of Radiology, NRS Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India. Informed consent from the parents and Hospital Ethical committee clearance was duly taken. All neonates and infants presenting with nonbilious vomiting with or without visible gastric peristalsis, with biochemical parameters supporting IHPS were our study population. This is an hospital-based prospective type of observational study performed between the period of January 2018 and June 2019. The number of patients were 40 (male 36 [90%] and female 4 [10%]). Age ranges were: <4 weeks – 4 cases (10%), 4–8 weeks − 26 cases (65%), and >8 weeks – 10 cases (25%). Biochemical parameters found were hyponatremia – 20 cases (50%), hypokalemia – 28 cases (70%), hypochloremia – 26 cases (75%), and altered bicarbonate – S20 cases (50%).

Exclusion criteria

Pyloric parameters (CL and MT) were not evaluated in: (1) redo pyloromyotomy cases, (2) patients with bilious vomiting with the suspicion of other gastrointestinal pathology, and (3) association of systemic causes of vomiting.

We have used 500 mA X-ray machine with flouroscopic facility and ultrasonography machine: Phillips HD 7 machine and Alpinion E-CUBE with 3–12 MHz linear probe, 3.5–5 MHz curvilinear probe, and 5–7.5 MHz sector probe.

The baby is placed in the supine position with requirement of sedation in a few cases. Examination is started in the epigastric region and the transducer knob toward the head of the infant to obtain a sagittal scan, starting in the midline and gradually toward the right hypochondrium until the pylorus can be identified between the distended stomach on the left side and duodenum and gall bladder on the right side. In difficult cases such as excessive gas in the stomach, scan is hindered and a gravity-dependent maneuvers by positioning the infant in oblique positions by raising their left side up which displaces gas away from pylorus and gastric fluid toward pylorus, facilitates pyloric identification better. Sometimes, bottle feeding is proved to be helpful. After locating pylorus, transducer is rotated to obtain the longitudinal and transverse scans for measurement. Statistical analysis of the measurement of pyloric morphometry of preoperative and postoperative scans was done using the Microsoft excel data analysis with regression statistics showing P values (P < 0.05 was considered significant with 95% confidence limits).

Sonographic pictures of normal pylorus are: (a) Mucosa–echogenic, (b) muscularis mucosa: hypoechoic, (c) submucosa: echogenic, (d) muscularis externa – hypoechoic, (e) and serosa – echoic. The sonographic criteria for positive IHPS are pyloric MT >3 mm, pyloric CL >14 mm with increased vascularity of pyloric muscle and mucosa, whereas MT <3 mm, CL <14 mm, and minimal vascularity of pyloric muscle and mucosa indicate negative for IHPS. Pyloric MT between 2 and 3 mm and CL between 12 and 14 mm are considered borderline cases. Sonographic signs of pyloric stenosis are: (a) target sign peripheral ring of hypertrophied and hypoechoic muscle sorrounding central echogenic mucosa, resembling a doughnut; (b) Antral nipple sign: redundant pyloric mucosa protrudes into the gastric antrum; (c) collapsed mucosa, echogenic submucosa, thickened and elongated muscularis externa, compressed lumina with elongation of pyloric canal and increased vascularity of pyloric muscle and mucosa [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Abnormal pylorus (in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis)-longitudinal image

Click here to view
Figure 2: Abnormal pylorus (in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis) – transverse image

Click here to view



   Results and Analysis Top


Postoperative HRUS evaluation after 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months of Ramstedt operation is shown in [Table 1]. It shows that the majority of cases (80%) regained normal pyloric MT and CL after the 6 months of operation [Table 2]. The test of significance done by using the Microsoft excel regression data analysis shows P value, as shown in [Table 3]. Preoperative and postoperative HRUS pictures of MT and CL are shown in [Figure 3],[Figure 4],[Figure 5].
Table 1: Mean values of pyloric muscle thickness and canal length with 1 standard deviation (n=40 cases)

Click here to view
Table 2: Postoperative follow-up for the resolution of pyloric parameters (muscle thickness and canal length) with high-resolution ultrasound at 2, 4, and 6 months (n=40 cases)

Click here to view
Table 3: Analysis of significance (P <0.05 - significant)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Preoperative high-resolution ultrasound (muscle thickness 6.6 mm and canal length 20.5 mm)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Postoperative (4 mo.) high-resolution ultrasound (muscle thickness 4.6 mm and canal length 18.3 mm)

Click here to view
Figure 5: Postoperative (6 mo.) high-resolution ultrasound (muscle thickness 3 mm and canal length 16 mm)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


HRUS with curvilinear probe has become the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of IHPS. It is the noninvasive technique requiring approximately 10 min. It can be repeated and has no side effects. Eltomey et al.[1] studied the cases of IHPS at postoperative day 3, after 1 week and 1 month and divided postpyloromyotomy changes in two major categories: (a) static images of pyloric muscle morphology and measurements and (b) dynamic real-time B-mode images of pyloric muscle behavior. They found that pylorus retains the doughnut shape with distortion of contour at the pyloromyotomy site. Preoperative MT (4.6 ± 0.6 mm), CL (19.6 ± 3 mm) comparison with postoperative MT on day 3 (5.1 ± 0.7 mm), after 1 week (5 ± 0.6 mm) and after 1 month (4.7 ± 0.6 mm), and postoperative CL on day 3 (18.3 ± 2.4 mm), 1 week (16.6 ± 2 mm), and after 1 month (13.9 ± 2 mm) were done. Initial increase of MT and CL on day 3 and 1 week gradually return to the preoperative levels after 1 month. Both (pre- and post-operative MT and CL) are statistically significant (P < 0.05).[1] Yoshizawa et al.[2] and Muramori et al.[3] showed pyloric MT increase in the early postoperative period. The increase in MT is thought to be due to elastic recoil of the splitted muscle and associated edema of the pylorus.[3],[4],[5],[6] On the contrary, the CL showed a steady decrease postoperatively.[1],[2],[3] Lowe et al.[7] determined the pyloric ratio (wall thickness/pyloric diameter [PD]) and its relationship to weight. The average pyloric ratios in normal children and those with IHPS were 0.205 and 0.325, respectively (P < 0.001). They designated pyloric ratio to be a highly specific sensitive and weight independent indicator of IHPS.[7] Whereas Huang et al.[8] used the alternative pyloric ratio (APR) (pyloric intermuscular space/diameter of pylorus), where intermuscular space consists of the edematous mucosa and the lumen of the pyloric canal and increased APR clearly corroborates with improved clinical symptoms.

The expected time for normalization of the pyloric MT and CL is estimated to be between 12 weeks and 8 months.[2],[3],[4],[5] Ultrasound has become a tool of choice in following up the patients as well.[6] Sauerbrei and Paloschi[6] showed that MT and CL become normal within 6 weeks. A study by Tander et al.[9] using the parameters of MT, CL, and PD in the postoperative period found only MT to be the most useful for evaluation. Our study shows that the resolution of pyloric MT and CL to normal values is only 5% by 2 months, 30% by 4 months, and 80% by 6 months. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) is observed between the grouped data of preoperative MT and postoperative (6 months) MT by HRUS. Whereas, postoperative pyloric CL, although reduced than preoperative levels, does not show statistical significance even at 6 months.

The limitations of our study are the lack of patients with failed pyloromyotomy and hence are excluded from this study. However, Huang et al. recommends follow-up sonography for the minority of cases unsuccessful after pyloromyotomy.[8]


   Conclusions Top


Serial postoperative HRUS in cases of IHPS shows gradual attainment (mostly by 6 months) of normalcy of pyloric parameters such as MT and CL after a successful pyloromyotomy. Serial evaluation of pyloric MT is more significant and predictive of attainment of normal parameters, as compared to the preoperative cases of IHPS.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Eltomey MA, Ghareeb HA. Postoperative ultrasonography changes of the pylorus in infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Egypt J Rad Nucl Med 2014;45:897-902.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Yoshizawa J, Eto T, Higashimoto Y, Saitao T, Maie M. Ultrasonographic features of normalization of the pylorus after pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J pediatr Surg 2001;36:582-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Muramori K, Nagasaki A, Kawanami T. Ultrasonographic serial measurements of the morphologic resolution of the pylorus after ramstedt pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1681-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Okorie NM, Dickson JA, Carver RA, Steiner GM. What happens to the pylorus after pyloromyotomy? Arch Dis Child 1988;63:1339-41.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Vasileios R, Naoum K, Dimitrios R. US evaluation of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis before and after pyloromyotomy. Eurorad Radiological Case Database [serial on the internet], 2013; Available from:<http://www.eurorad.org/eurorad.case.php?id=11369> [Last accessed on 10 Jan 2020].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sauerbrei EE, Paloschi GG. The ultrasonic features of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, with emphasis on the postoperative appearance. Radiology 1983;147:503-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lowe LH, Banks WJ, Shyr Y. Pyloric ratio: Efficacy in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:773-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Huang YL, Lee HC, Yeung CY, Chen WT, Jiang CB, Sheu JC, et al. Sonogram before and after pyloromyotomy: The pyloric ratio in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Neonatol 2009;50:117-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Tander B, Akalin A, Abbasoğlu L, Bulut M. Ultrasonographic follow-up of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis after pyloromyotomy: A controlled prospective study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2002;12:379-82.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,613 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results and Analysis
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed191    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded16    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05