Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:307 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 390-392
 

Rare association of isolated microphthalmia with anorectal malformation


Department of Paediatric Surgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission20-Sep-2019
Date of Decision28-Dec-2019
Date of Acceptance07-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication27-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rajeev Redkar
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Bandra West, Mumbai - 400 050, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_167_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Anorectal malformations (ARMs) have coexisting congenital anomalies. These can affect the overall prognosis. Anomalous craniofacial associations are less common. Recently, we managed two patients of ARM associated with unilateral microphthalmia, without any other major systemic anomalies. This was found to be a rare association on extensive literature search.


Keywords: Anorectal malformation, microphthalmia, rare


How to cite this article:
Tewari S, Joshi S, Raj V, Sushma A, Redkar R. Rare association of isolated microphthalmia with anorectal malformation. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2020;25:390-2

How to cite this URL:
Tewari S, Joshi S, Raj V, Sushma A, Redkar R. Rare association of isolated microphthalmia with anorectal malformation. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 28];25:390-2. Available from: https://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2020/25/6/390/299192





   Introduction Top


Anorectal malformation (ARM) is a complex group of congenital anomalies. Abnormal development of allantois, hindgut, and Müllerian duct can cause partial/incomplete malformation of urorectal septum. Incidence is around 1 in 4000–5000 live births with isolated incidence of around 35%–40%. Approximately 60%–65% have other associated systemic defects.[1] Chromosomal anomalies can be seen in about 7%–10% with occasional evidence of familial association.[2] Syndromic association with coexisting birth defects has an incidence of around 50%. Overall, quality of life as well as prognosis in such patients depends on the severity of associated anomalies.[3] Thus, all patients with a diagnosis of ARMs must be examined meticulously to detect coexisting anomalies. We recently managed two female infants with ARM associated with unilateral microphthalmia. This combination of anomalies is rarely reported and thus needs to be documented.


   Case Report Top


The first infant was a full-term female child, born out of a nonconsanguineous marriage, with birth weight of 2.3 kg, diagnosed to have imperforate anus with rectovestibular fistula. Echocardiography noted mild left ventricular hypertrophy. On clinical examination, she was found to have right microphthalmia without any other ocular abnormality or vision anomaly. She did not need any treatment for same. She underwent a primary rectal pull-through procedure and recovered well [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Patient 1 with microphthalmia

Click here to view


The second patient was a preterm female child, product of nonconsanguineous marriage, with birth weight of 2.8 kg. She was also diagnosed with imperforate anus and rectovestibular fistula. She was found to have right microphthalmia with no other ocular anomalies. She did not suffer from any other associated anomalies and was deemed fit for surgical intervention for ARM. She underwent staged procedure – colostomy was done initially followed by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and then colostomy closure with a gap of 2–3 months between all the procedures. Patient is currently on regular follow-up and thriving well and does not suffer from any vision anomalies [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Patient 2 with right microphthalmia

Click here to view


Both patients had a primary diagnosis of anorectal malformation with rectovestibular fistula. They were extensively evaluated and were found to have microphthalmia without any other major systemic anomalies.


   Discussion Top


Anorectal malformation is a common congenital anomaly diagnosed at birth. Patients may have associated anomalies that can be broadly classified as major and minor. According to a large study done, systems showing common involvement include genitourinary (45%–50%), musculoskeletal (40%–45%), craniofacial (30%–35%), cardiovascular (27%), gastrointestinal (18%), respiratory anomalies (13%), and central nervous system anomalies (12%).[4] Genetics in ARM are highly complex and many candidate genes have been identified. They are classified as “field defects,” as they are a result of complex genetic interactions.[5] These multiple anomalies can be syndromic or nonsyndromic, associated with chromosomal abnormalities or due to environmental influence.

As per classification done in a study based on the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies for ARM-associated anomalies, the associations are categorized as follows:

  1. VACTERL association
  2. Multiple congenital anomalies with two/more defects without a recognizable pattern
  3. Syndromes with a known cause (teratogenic, monogenic, or chromosomal)
  4. Recognized sequences and syndromes.


As critical organogenesis happens before the 6th–7th week, the defect is assumed to have occurred in early gestation. Eye development begins around the 3rd week of gestation. Two small grooves develop on forebrain known as sulci or optic grooves. Microphthalmia is rare congenital anomaly with isolated incidence of about 1 in 10,000 births.[6] It can occur if infection is acquired during pregnancy or could have genetic transmission, but the exact cause is unknown. Maternal age over 40 years or history of multiple births as well as low gestational age of infant or low birth weight are other associated risk factors. Complex microphthalmia is the presence of other associated ocular disorders. These include anterior segment defects such as sclerocornea or posterior segment involvement such as retinal dysplasia and persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous. Learning disabilities are associated in few cases. Multidisciplinary management involves pediatricians and ophthalmologists with occasional involvement of clinical geneticists, if syndromic association is suspected. Treatment aims at sustaining existing vision and improving cosmesis by the growth of bony orbit and soft-tissue stimulation and is usually started early, within weeks of life to improve the overall development of such patients. Mild-to-moderate forms can be managed conservatively with shapers/conformers. Severe cases require surgical remodeling for endo-orbital volume replacement that can be achieved with expanders, grafts, or implants as well as the reconstruction of soft tissue. Visual potential depends on the development of retina and other ocular features.[7]

Once ocular anomaly is suspected in a patient with ARM, assessment should be done by a pediatric ophthalmologist as soon as possible. Both eyes should be examined especially in case of unilateral ocular anomaly, as the opposite eye might also have subtle anomalies. Ultrasound of the eye and orbit evaluates the inner structure of the eye and determines axial length in cases of microphthalmia. Vision assessment by flash visual-evoked potential will establish the presence of vision, establish the level of acuity, and detect any optic nerve dysfunction. Retinal dysfunction can be assessed by electroretinogram. Genetic evaluation can be done by chromosome analysis for the testing of particular genes. Management of such cases has multidisciplinary approach. Surgical management of both ARM and microphthalmia can be done in conjunction as per the severity of the condition and clinical stability of the patient. In unilateral cases, the asymmetry may become more pronounced as the child grows. In severe microphthalmia, early socket expansion is started soon after birth to minimize facial deformity. Sequential socket expansion is done for its progressive growth until symmetry is achieved or more expansion is not possible. If the axial length of microphthalmic eye is <16 mm, it is unlikely to promote normal growth and socket expansion is required. After initial socket expansion over the first 5 years of life, a yearly review should be done to assess growth.[8]

Ocular anomalies such as iris coloboma, microphthalmia, and cat eye syndrome (CES) have been reported with ARM. A large series, including 103 patients with ARMs with associated anomalies, by Cho et al., observed malformation syndromes in only three patients, which consisted of Opitz Syndrome, CES, and Potter syndrome type 1.

Most commonly, CES occurs as a triad of iris coloboma with preauricular anomalies and anal atresia. Less frequently, other ocular features can occur, such as unilateral microphthalmia, cornea clouding, aniridia, or cataract. The most common genetic defect is a supernumerary small bisatellited marker chromosome that causes partial tetrasomy of 22pter-22q11. The management is multidisciplinary as it depends on the presenting symptoms in each case. Severe malformations can have a higher mortality rate in early infancy, but in general, life expectancy is not greatly reduced.[9]

Isolated association between ARM and unilateral microphthalmia was not reported on extensive literature search. Thus, this association could be attributed to a rare phenotypic variation of CES or incidental presence of two isolated developmental defects.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/ her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Cuschieri A; EUROCAT Working Group. Descriptive epidemiology of isolated anal anomalies: A survey of 4.6 million births in Europe. Am J Med Genet 2001;103:207-15.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Boocock GR, Donnai D. Anorectal malformations: Familial aspects and associated anomalies. Arch Dis Child 1987;62:576-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cho S, Moore SP, Fangman T. One hundred three consecutive patients with anorectal malformations and their associated anomalies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:587-91.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mirza B, Ijaz L, Saleem M, Sharif M, Sheikh A. Anorectal malformations in neonates. Afr J Pediatr Surg 2011;8:151-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Moore SW. Associations of anorectal malformations and related syndromes. Pediatr Surg Int 2013;29:665-76.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Weber FM, Dooley RR, Sparkes RS. Anal atresia, eye anomalies, and an additional small abnormal acrocentric chromosome (47, XX, mar+): Report of a case. J Pediatr 1970;76:594-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Verma AS, Fitzpatrick DR. Anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007;2:47.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ragge N, Subak-Sharpe I, Collin J. A practical guide to the management of anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Eye 2007;21:1290-300.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Rosias PR, Sijstermans JM, Theunissen PM, Pulles-Heintzberger CF, De Die-Smulders CE, Engelen JJ, et al. Phenotypic variability of the cat eye syndrome. Case report and review of the literature. Genet Couns 2001;12:273-82.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (711 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed90    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05