Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:1761 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

Table of Contents   
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 237-246

Tissue engineering and stem cell therapy in pediatric urology

Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication29-Aug-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shilpa Sharma
Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_77_18

Rights and Permissions



The rapidly expanding field of tissue engineering along with stem cell therapy has a promising future in pediatric urological conditions. The initial struggle seemed difficult in renal regeneration but a functional biounit has been developed. Urine excretion has been demonstrated successfully from stem cell-generated embryonic kidneys. Three-dimensional (3D) stem cell-derived organoids are the new paradigm in research. Techniques to regenerate bladder tissue have reached the clinic, and the urethra is close behind. 3D bioprinted urethras would soon be available. Artificial germ cells produced from mouse pluripotent stem cells have been shown to give rise to live progeny. Myoblast and fibroblast therapy has been safely and effectively used for urinary incontinence. Stress urinary incontinence has been clinically treated with muscle-derived stem cells. Skeletal muscle-derived stem cells have been shown to get converted into smooth muscle cells when implanted into the corpora cavernosa in animal models. This review encompasses the various experimental and clinical developments in this field that can benefit pediatric urological conditions with the contemporary developments in the field.

Keywords: Bone marrow cells, cell therapy, nanotechnology

How to cite this article:
Sharma S, Gupta DK. Tissue engineering and stem cell therapy in pediatric urology. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2019;24:237-46

How to cite this URL:
Sharma S, Gupta DK. Tissue engineering and stem cell therapy in pediatric urology. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 25];24:237-46. Available from: https://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2019/24/4/237/265709

   Introduction Top

Scientific and technological advances have been growing at a fast pace in the field of stem cell biology and tissue engineering research. Ever since the fact was acknowledged that stem cells can be used to cure a number of diseases, the scientists, basic and clinical researchers have been leaving no stone unturned to find the possible methods and indications where this technology can be used for the benefit of mankind. Stem cells are undifferentiated, unspecialized cells with undetermined function which under the influence of a definite signal can divide and become a specialized cell with a defined function. There are various conditions in pediatric urology where the surgeon feels that the tissue is inadequate due to congenital absence, disease or injury and hopes for some bioengineered tissues to fill in the gaps. Stem cells with potential to transform into healthy cells and repair damaged cells may prove beneficial in various congenital malformations.[1]

In urology, the limitations of tissue engineering include reduced proliferative capacity and low qualityin vitro cultures of urothelial cells and the fact that tissue engineering cannot be used to treat malignancy. Allogenic tissue/organ replacement surgery has been associated with rejection or need for immunosuppression. Hence, autologous cells have been explored to avoid these issues. Accordingly, with recent advances, the need for tissue engineering and stem cell biology to go hand in hand is recognized where bioengineered tissue is generated using autologous stem cells for clinical applications. This review outlines the developmental and technological advances in this field that can benefit pediatric urological conditions and portrays the future scientific directions to improve the outcomes.

   Origin of Stem Cells Top

Mouse embryonic stem cells in laboratory were first discovered in 1981. Seventeen years later, in 1998, Human embryonic stem cells were discovered simultaneously from blastocyst by James Thomson at University of Wisconsin-Madison and from primordial germ cells by John Gearhart at Johns Hopkins University. There are four types of stem cell populations according to Hierarchy [Figure 1]:
Figure 1: Various types of Stem cells according to hierarchy

Click here to view

  1. Totipotent: capable of forming a complete human being, e.g., zygote
  2. Pluripotent not capable of a complete human being, but almost all the tissues of a human being e.g., germ cell
  3. Multipotent capable of forming many cell types, for example, hematopoietic stem cells
  4. Unipotent capable of forming a single cell type, for example, skin, nerve, progenitor cells.

   Sources of Stem Cells Top

For a pediatric surgeon to understand the science and technology of tissue engineering at a molecular level, it is important to understand the various cell types and their sources. The commonly available sources of stem cells include

  1. Embryonic stem cells: These can be derived from excess human embryos and aborted fetuses. The limitations include ethical issues, restricted resource, incompatibility, and risk of tumor generation
  2. Adult stem cells: These cells are derived from tissues that develop from all three embryonic germ layers. For example, brain (particularly hippocampus), bone marrow, peripheral blood, blood vessels, skeletal muscle, epithelia of the skin and digestive system, cornea, tooth dental pulp, retina, and liver, pancreas. The sources of stem cells for utility in pediatric urology are hematopoietic, mesenchymal and spermatogonial stem cells
  3. Umbilical cord blood stem cells. These are multipotent stem cells, similar to adult stem cells. The advantages include easy availability, immaturity, reduced rejection
  4. Amniotic fluid stem cells. These were discovered recently in 2003. They are pluripotent. The advantages include the possible differentiation into all three germ layers with low immunogenicity and high anti-inflammatory action
  5. Placental stem cells. These are multipotent adult stem cells. They possess the phenotypic plasticity of many cells with immunomodulatory properties
  6. Induced pluripotent stem cells. These stem cells are derived from patient's tissue and induced into pluripotency. The most common and successful method of inducing pluripotency is through viral vectors, which questions the associated dangers in clinical treatments[2]
  7. Urine-derived stem cells. These are derived from the parietal cells or podocytes within glomerulus in kidney and can be isolated from voided urine.[3]

   Cell Based or Regenerative Therapy Top

Stem cell therapy may be either cell-based therapy that may be used to provide cells for reparative tissue such as the kidney or regenerative or reparative medicine that would be needed to replenish lost tissue like the ureter or the urethra. The authors have used the spare preputial skin in cases of circumcism and urethroplasty for research work.[4],[5]

   Role of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells in Urology Top

Pediatric urological conditions amenable to cell-based or regenerative therapy are depicted in [Table 1].
Table 1: Conditions in Pediatric Urology amenable to cell based therapy

Click here to view

The various tissues that may be derived using tissue engineering and stem cell therapy include [Figure 2]:
Figure 2: Urological tissues that may be derived using tissue engineering and stem cell therapy include (a) Renal tissue and urinary tract tissues like ureter, bladder, urethra (b) male genital tract such as testicular tissue, (c) female genital tract such as ovarian tissue and healthy endometrial tissue

Click here to view

  1. Renal tissue
  2. Urinary tract tissues: ureter, bladder, urethra
  3. Sphincter muscle tissue
  4. Gonadal tissue and Gametes
  5. Cavernosal tissue.

   Renal Tissue Top

The kidney is the most important organ in urology. The number of renal transplants is increasing every day and the dearth of donor organs continues in countries where the cadaveric donor program is low. Although a large of scientists are working on the role of stem cells in renal regeneration, the challenge is grave as there are numerous different types of cells that make up a functional nephron. The use of renal progenitor cells to generate complex renal structures has been attempted.[6] Adult bone marrow stem cells have been shown to differentiate into renal tubular epithelial cells and associated stromal cells.[7] The main aim of cell-based therapy with supplementary cells in the repair and regeneration of a damaged kidney to accelerate the natural healing process through cellular supplementation by rooting them in the natural healing process.[8] Renal cell repair and regeneration following acute renal failure follows a program of de-differentiation, migration and proliferation, and restoration of differentiated function. Accelerating and augmenting this process through cellular supplementation is beneficial.[9] Gupta et al. isolated a unique population of cells that behaved similar to a renal stem cell from rat kidneys that exhibited plasticity demonstrated by the ability of the cells to be induced to express endothelial, hepatocyte, and neural markers by reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunohistochemistry.[10] These cells could differentiate into renal tubules when injected under the capsule of an uninjured kidney or intra-arterially after renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. The authors have identified renal stem cells in a mouse model of Obstructive renopathy that can be targeted to preserve renal function.[11] The authors have clinically used bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells in a single case of bilateral multicystic kidney disease and demonstrated improvement in renal function parameters and formation of immature tubules though the baby succumbed at 17 months age.[12] Urine excretion has been demonstrated successfully from stem cell-generated embryonic kidneys.[13] Methods have been established to generate kidney organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. These organoids consist of cells with the characteristics of podocytes, proximal tubules, loops of Henle, and distal convoluted tubules in a contiguous arrangement resembling nephronsin vivo as well as interstitial cells.

   Urinary Tract Tissues Top

The urinary tract tissues are mainly composed of two cell types, i.e., epithelial and mesenchymal. It is a great challenge to obtain both differentiated smooth muscle and urothelial cells from stem cells. Ureteral grafts have been created in experimental models. Tissue-engineered tubular grafts have been constructed by seeding bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and smooth muscle cells into a bladder acellular matrix for ureteral reconstruction.[14] There has been a lot of ongoing research in tissue engineering for bladder reconstruction.[3],[15] Bladder reconstruction with tissue engineering technology is possible through the use of normal autologous bladder cells seeded on biodegradable scaffolds.[16] The various types of stem cells used in preclinical animal models to repair or regenerate bladder tissue include pluripotent stem cells such as embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, multi-potent mesenchymal stem cells, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells, adipose-derived stem cells, hair follicle stem cells, umbilical MSCs, urothelial stem cells and most recently, urine-derived stem cells employing either trans-differentiation, or paracrine effects to stimulate endogenous cells participating in tissue.[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26] The authors have used autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells in cases of meningomyelocele and found improvement in the neurogenic bladders.[1] The authors had layered autologous bone marrow aspirate above the bladder closure during a redo repair of Exstrophy bladder. The child attained urinary continence that is persistent at 7 years' follow-up.

The urethra has been the most studied organ in tissue engineering and stem cell research. Atala was the first one to use tissue-engineered urethra[27] Tissue-engineered grafts comprising of epithelial cells seeded on scaffolds have been explored for urethroplasty.[28] Epithelial cells from urinary bladder, urethra, and buccal mucosa have been used in tissue-engineered grafts for urethroplasty and urethral reconstructive surgeries. Raya-Rivera et al. created tissue-engineered autologous tubularized urethras in five boys with urethral defects.[29] They isolated stem cells from bladder tissue, seeded them onto a synthetic tubular meshwork and created tissue-engineered tubularized urethras that were then used for urethral reconstruction. They reported a 100% success over a median follow-up of 71 months.[29] Unfortunately, these results have not been replicated by others. Attempts to produce tissue-engineered oral mucosa as a substitute for the patient's natural buccal mucosa have yielded disappointing results.[30]

Treatment of urethral stricture using tissue-engineered epithelial cell graft has evoked keen interest among urologists because of the ample availability of tissue-engineered graft and minimal donor site morbidity.[31]In vitro studies have demonstrated that epithelial cell-conditioned medium from various confluent epithelial cell cultures inhibits urethral stricture fibroblasts' proliferation and migration.[32] Urethral reconstruction with autologous urine-derived stem cells seeded in three-dimensional porous small intestinal submucosa in a rabbit model has been reported.[33] Urine-derived stem cells easily isolated from voided urine can be extensively expanded to high numbers in vitro, and efficiently give rise to urothelial cells and smooth muscle cellsin vitro and vivo and can be utilized as a promising cell source for tissue-engineered urethras.[33]

   Sphincter Muscle Tissue Top

Research on stress incontinence in both sexes has been one of the focal areas of research.[34] A triple injection of muscle, neuron, and endothelial progenitor cells derived from human amniotic fluid stem cells has shown promising results in mice with urethral sphincter damage.[35] The common sources for clinical use include skeletal-muscle-derived progenitor cells or muscle-derived stem cells, myoblasts and fibroblasts. The advantage of muscle-derived stem cells is that these will fuse to form postmitotic multinucleated myotubes and thus would limit persistent expansion and risk of obstruction that may occur with other cell sources such as fibroblasts. Carr et al. treated eight women with stress urinary incontinence with muscle-derived stem cells and reported a total continence rate of 70% at 1 year follow-up.[36] The use of myoblast and fibroblast therapy has been described as safe and effective treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence at 1-year follow-up.[37]

   Gonadal Tissue and Gametes Top

The various types of stem cells that have been used to produce sperm cells include Spermatogonial stem cell, embryonic stem cell, and bone marrow stem cell.

Spermatogonial stem cell was first described by Brinster et al. in transgenic mice in 1994.[38] They isolated stem cells from testes of donor male mice that repopulated sterile testes when injected into seminiferous tubules. The donor cell spermatogenesis in recipient testes showed normal morphological characteristics and produced mature spermatozoa. These unipotent stem cell lines are found in male testis. The spermatogonial stem cells can be harvested and cryopreserved and subsequently transplanted back to the patient during his reproductive age. This procedure can be especially beneficial in young children receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The spermatogonial stem cell is still in experimental stage with limited research into efficacy of approach. The spermatogonial stem cells have also been shown to differentiate into renal cells, though further clinical research is needed to fully explore potential therapeutic strategies.[39]

In 2003, Hubner et al. reported that oocyte-like cells could be produced from mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro.[40] The artificial germ cells produced from mouse pluripotent stem cells proved to be functional as they were capable to differentiate into spermatozoa and oocytes that can give rise to live progeny.[41] However, these still showed some notable differences from theirin vivo counterparts and culture conditions suitable to complete oogenesis and spermatogenesisin vitro have not been established yet.[41]

The ability to derive male germ cells from bone marrow stem cells reveals novel aspects of germ cell development and opens the possibilities for use of these cells in reproductive medicine. In mice, adult bone marrow cells, in a favorable testicular environment have been shown to differentiate into somatic and germ cell lineages.[42] The resident neighboring cells in the recipient testis may control site-appropriate stem cell differentiation.[42] This clinically relevant finding raises the possibility for treatment of male infertility and testosterone deficiency through the therapeutic use of stem cells. In humans, no live offspring have been documented so far and transdifferentiation is limited to the stage of spermatogonium only male germline stem cells maintain spermatogenesis in the postnatal human testis. Drusenheimer et al. showed that a small population of bone marrow cells can transdifferentiate to male germ cell-like cells.[43] These preliminary findings provided direct evidence that human bone marrow cells can differentiate to putative male germ cells, and thus, bone marrow is a potential source of male germ cells that could sustain sperm production.[43]

   Cavernosal Tissue Top

The cell sources that have been explored for cavernosal tissue are bone marrow stem cells, adipose tissue-derived stem cells, and neural crest stem cells. They may be useful in cases with poorly developed phallus in proximal hypospadias especially when associated with disorders of sexual differentiation. They are also useful in erectile dysfunction where there is damage to penile cavernous smooth muscle cells and sinus endothelial cells.[44],[45]

Human neural crest stem cells transplanted into the rat penile corpus cavernosum differentiated into endothelial cells or smooth muscle cells, as shown by their expression of cell type-specific markers for the cell types.[44] Skeletal muscle-derived stem cells have been shown to get converted into smooth muscle cells when implanted into the corpora cavernosa in rat models.[45]

   Contemporary Developments and New Technology Top

To overcome the challenges in tissue engineering and stem cell therapy, scientists having been exploring new approaches and targeting the cells with different approaches. These include

Improving angiogenesis by combination of stem cell approaches

It has been observed that the central area of the tissue engineered grafts have low nutrient and oxygen supply that is responsible for incomplete regeneration and graft failure.[46] This is specially noticed in the structurally larger grafts used for bladder reconstruction. Scientists have thus explored the use of a combination of the two stem cell types such as mesenchymal stem cell and hematopoietic stem progenitor cells which has shown to improve vascularization of the entire graft, including the center area.[47] In addition, adding prevascularization strategies such as generation of preformed microvascular networks in grafts before implantation to the combined stem cell approaches is also beneficial for implantation of large grafts.[48]

Utilizing induced pluripotent stem cells

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are prime candidates for tissue engineering strategies. They can be generated directly from adult tissue by converting adult cells to stem cells using specific genes that encode transcription factors. These can further be differentiated into urothelial and smooth muscle cells.[49],[50] The advantage of iPSCs is that though they share similar plasticity to embryonic stem cell, they can be easily obtained.

Exploring potential of urine-derived stem cells

The discovery of urine-derived stem cells has opened a new field for further research.[3],[25]In vitro research with addition of urine-derived stem cells to small intestinal submucosa graft has shown better regeneration regarding urethral caliber, speed of urothelial regeneration, content of smooth muscle, and vessel density compared to an acellular graft with less inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis.[33]

Identification of progenitor cells in urothelium

Resident multipotent progenitor cells have been identified in the urinary bladder urothelium in the basal cells and intermediate cells following various types of experimental bladder injury. Exploring the potential of indigenous progenitor cell sources are needed for further growth in the field of regeneration.[51] These include cells such as keratin 5-positive basal cells and UP3-positive intermediate cells.[51],[52],[53]

Understanding dynamic reciprocity and regulating remodeling

Understanding the molecular signaling pathways and dynamic crosstalk between the urothelium and stroma in bladder regeneration is vital for further growth in the field of regeneration.[51] Dynamic reciprocity refers to the interactions between urothelium and stroma and bi-directional interactions between tissue-engineered grafts and the host tissue environment.[54] These are vital as they influence the outcomes in tissue remodeling. The various elements of remodeling include host cell adhesion and migration, differentiation, immune response such as macrophage reaction, differentiation, apoptosis, and formation of new extracellular matrix. Two types of macrophages – pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and anti-inflammatory macrophages of M2 type – play distinct roles in tissue repair during wound healing following injury of various tissues.[51],[55] Both types of macrophages are needed in a dynamic sequence during tissue repair. It has been shown that pore size and fiber diameter of scaffolds alter macrophage activation, leaning to an increased presence of either M1 or M2 phenotypes.[56],[57] A coordinated sequence of M1 over M2 dominance in an early period of repair seems to promote angiogenesis, while M2 over M1 dominance in later stages seem to induce functional tissue formation and diminish scar tissue formation.[58],[59]

Creating smart scaffolds

Smart scaffolds are the latest thrill in the field of tissue engineering. These specifically designed scaffolds release trophic factors in a set way and have been used to optimize host reactions toward the scaffold.[51] The timely release of bioactive substances such as interleukins-4, 13, interferon-regulatory factors, and pharmacologic modulators of retinoic acid-related peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling may help to modulate the macrophages M1 and M2 involved in tissue regeneration.[60],[61],[62] Retinoic acid-dependent pathways are important for the final stages of urothelial differentiation.[52] Although growth factors are present in acellular natural derived grafts, it has been seen that they do not yield satisfactory outcomes. Modifying such growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor-2 and insulin-like growth factor-1 fusion protein have been shown to promote vascularization, smooth muscle cell repair and ingrowth, and urodynamic parameters.[63],[64] Administration of a mixture of growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor; nerve growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor has yielded better histological outcome and functional bladder contractility; bladder capacity and compliance, respectively.[65],[66]

Utilizing nanotechnology

Nanotechnology involves the use of nanoparticles that are very small in size in the range of 0.1–100 nm. Nanoparticles are also unique in the fact that they show completely novel physicochemical properties from their bulk counterpart. The promise of nanoparticles for diagnostic and therapeutic applications has been widely explored. In stem cell research, nanoparticles can enable targeted and controlled stem cell delivery. Thus, use of nanoparticles helps to further harness the potential of stem cells for biotherapeutic applications as these small particles can be used to deliver the stem cells to the site of action that may be even intracellular. Thus, effective amalgamation of nanotechnology and stem cell-offers immense benefits.[67],[68] Various aspects of nanotechnology in stem cell research like stem cell visualization and imaging, genetic modifications and reprogramming by gene delivery systems and creating stem cell niches need attention.[67] Various nanocarrier systems, such as carbon nanotubes, quantum dots, nanofibers, nanoparticles, nanodiamonds, nanoparticle scaffold, etc., can be utilized for the delivery of stem cells inside the body [Figure 3]. Highly uniform nanoparticles widely used in medicine include colloidal gold nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles, titania nanoparticles, inorganic fluorescent nanoparticles (quantum dots and upconversion nanocrystals), as well as biodegradable polymer nanoparticles. Carbon dots (C-dots) are generally small carbon nanoparticles (<10 nm in size) with good solubility high stability, good conductivity, low toxicity and strong luminescence, c-dots have found wide applications including imaging, biosensor, drug delivery, and tissue and implant engineering. They are highly uniform and monodisperse without agglomeration and aggregation. Fluorescent carbon quantum dots can have a wide particle size range for broad applications. Graphene and graphene oxide with different layers and sizes can also be used for stem cell delivery in larger quantities. The carbon nanotube can be of various types; single-walled, double-walled and multi-walled structures with different size and surface modifications. Nanotechnology-assisted adipose-derived stem cell therapy has been found beneficial in an experimental rodent model for erectile dysfunction of cavernous nerve injury.[69] With nanoparticles, beneficial effects with a lower dose of stem cells were seen thus reducing the chances of any inadvertent side effects of stem cell therapy.[69] The mechanism of erectile function improvement was proposed to be related to the regeneration of the smooth muscle, endothelium, and nerve tissues.
Figure 3: Numerous nanoparticles that can be used for stem cell delivery

Click here to view

   Challenges in Clinical Applications of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Therapy in Pediatric Urology Top

The attempts to form an artificial bladder date back to 1950s when nonbiodegradable synthetic materials such as polytetrafluoroethylene, silicone, rubber, polyvinyl, and polypropylene were tried but were found to rapidly encrust with prolonged urinary contact.[70] In addition, these materials were susceptible to bacterial colonization and foreign body reactions.[71] While basic stem cell and tissue engineering research is expanding rapidly, translation of the basic research to clinical practice has been at an exceedingly slow pace. Till date, there have been only limited applications of tissue engineering and stem cell therapy in pediatric urology. Most of the research has been mainly in the experimental domain. The main reasons for the same have been ethical concerns regarding the harvest and use of embryonic stem cells, lack of sufficient differentiation protocols and risk of senescence, and epigenetic modifications in adult stem cells.

Although the possibility of renal regeneration is exciting in children with poorly functioning kidneys due to congenital anomalies, and autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells are relatively safe and ethical, there are certain anticipated hurdles.[9]

  1. Cell-based therapy may be more effective only in the initial few months of life when the kidney still has potential to develop
  2. The bone marrow in patients with chronic renal injury is usually hypoplastic. One may have to resort to Erythropoietin injections to stimulate the bone marrow
  3. Repeated doses of bone marrow-derived cells may be needed.

We need to implement tissue engineering with cell-based therapy individually for each case. Embryonic stem cells seem to be promising as far as plausibility of generation of many different cell types is concerned. However, the ethical concerns for the use of human embryonic stem cells are equally significant as the use of the embryo for the medicinal purpose is not approved ethically.[72] The existent national guidelines for stem cell research should be strictly adhered to depending on the jurisdiction where the research is carried out.[73] Autologous sources are advantageous as there is no need for immunosuppression for cellular therapies derived from them. However, autologous cells may be less desirable when dealing with genetic diseases because the cells may possess the same genetic predisposition to disease.[72]

   Future Directions Top

Potential impact of advances in stem cell technology on prospective cell-based therapeutic approaches for pediatric urology is enormous. A thorough understanding of basic stem cell biology and protocols to guide their differentiation toward specific cell fates in vitro, is needed. There is probably a practical reason to explore the utility of stem cell research in urology as the organs comprising the lower urinary tract are easily accessible by endoscopy with minimal morbidity.[74]

As embryonic stem cell research is restricted by ethical issues, scientists have explored other cell sources, including progenitor and stem cells derived from adult tissues, amniotic fluid, placenta and urine. In addition, newer methods of generating stem cells are being developed including somatic cell nuclear transfer, in which the nucleus of an adult somatic cell is placed into an oocyte, and reprogramed to induce stem-cell-like behavior. Such techniques are now being used in tissue engineering. Induced pluripotent stem cells have the potential to establish a new area of immunocompatible, on-demand renal transplantation. Successful integration of these cells as autograft therapies will require the demonstration of safety and efficacy equal or superior to the existing gold standards of kidney allograft transplantation and dialysis.[75]

Techniques to regenerate bladder tissue have reached the clinic, and exciting progress is being made regeneration of the kidney and urethra.[76],[77] An ideal engineered bladder should be composed of biocompatible material. It should be able to sustain mechanical forces for bladder filling and emptying. Engineered urothelial layer should contain tight junctions-effective barrier between bladder mesenchyme and urine. It should provide environmental cues that support neovascular in growth and not rejection by host immune system.

Further work is needed to ensure proper muscle alignment and adequate neovascularization. Appropriate seeding techniques need to be designed that will enable us to replicate anatomically correct and physiologically functional engineered bladders, promote angiogenesis, and neural regeneration to create the ideal, dynamic urinary reservoir.

Cell therapy as a treatment for incontinence and infertility might soon become a reality.[76] Scientists and clinicians should be optimistic that regenerative medicine and tissue engineering will one day provide the mainstream treatment options for urologic disorders.[76] Therapeutic cloning and cellular reprogramming may provide a potentially limitless source of cells for tissue engineering applications.[77] Seeding cells efficiently and uniformly onto three-dimensional scaffolds is the key for engineering urological tissue with an ideal histological structure in vitro.[78] This allows cells to interact positively with biomaterials, resulting in successful reconstructive surgery.[78]

The three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a new technique to replace traditional tissue engineering.[79] Zhang et al. loaded bladder epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells in hydrogel and maintained sufficient viability and proliferation in the hydrogel.[79] The highly porous scaffold mimics a natural urethral base-membrane and facilitates contacts between the printed epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells on both sides of the scaffold and thus provides a strong foundation for future studies on 3D bioprinted urethra. Limitations with 3D bioprinting in its present format are decreased mechanical strength and poor tissue integration and biocompatibility of constructs when implanted in vivo.

Acellular extracellular matrices are useful for repairing small urethral defects and cell-seeded extracellular matrices can augment or replace defective tissue segments in the ureter and bladder.[80] Although further immense detailed research is the need of the hour to fully utilize the hidden potential of stem cell research and tissue engineering, there is cautious optimism that the field of tissue engineering will play an increasing role in the management of a spectrum of urological disease.[81]

   Conclusions Top

To conclude, development of tissue engineering and stem-cell-based strategies for treatment of urological disorders is in its budding stage. It is vital to achieve a natural crosstalk between the transplanted stem cells and scaffold, host immune system and existing microenvironment. The delicate intricacies of the relationships between cell lines, extracellular matrices scaffolds and the host's physiological environment need to be fully elucidated to allow a rampant progress in tissue-engineering in urology from bench to bedside. Further basic and translational research is necessary to fully elucidate the possibilities and verify the optimal use of transplanted and residential stem cells along with biodegradable scaffolds made by tissue engineering.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Sharma S, Gupta DK, Venugopal P, Kumar L, Dattagupta S, Arora MK. Therapeutic use of stem cells in congenital anomalies: A pilot study. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2006;11:211-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
Morales EE, Wingert RA. Renal stem cell reprogramming: Prospects in regenerative medicine. World J Stem Cells 2014;6:458-66.  Back to cited text no. 2
Qin D, Long T, Deng J, Zhang Y. Urine-derived stem cells for potential use in bladder repair. Stem Cell Res Ther 2014;5:69.  Back to cited text no. 3
Kumar A, Mohanty S, Nandy SB, Gupta S, Khaitan BK, Sharma S, et al. Hair & skin derived progenitor cells: In search of a candidate cell for regenerative medicine. Indian J Med Res 2016;143:175-83.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Teotia P, Sharma S, Airan B, Mohanty S. Feeder & basic fibroblast growth factor-free culture of human embryonic stem cells: Role of conditioned medium from immortalized human feeders. Indian J Med Res 2016;144:838-51.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Humes HD, Buffington DA, MacKay SM, Funke AJ, Weitzel WF. Replacement of renal function in uremic animals with a tissue-engineered kidney. Nat Biotechnol 1999;17:451-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
Poulsom R, Forbes SJ, Hodivala-Dilke K, Ryan E, Wyles S, Navaratnarasah S, et al. Bone marrow contributes to renal parenchymal turnover and regeneration. J Pathol 2001;195:229-35.  Back to cited text no. 7
Brodie JC, Humes HD. Stem cell approaches for the treatment of renal failure. Pharmacol Rev 2005;57:299-313.  Back to cited text no. 8
Sharma S, Gupta DK. Scope for Renal Regeneration using bone marrow derived stem cells – How far away from bench to bedside? Proc Indian Natn Sci Acad 2010;76:89-95.  Back to cited text no. 9
Gupta S, Verfaillie C, Chmielewski D, Kren S, Eidman K, Connaire J, et al. Isolation and characterization of kidney-derived stem cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:3028-40.  Back to cited text no. 10
Sharma S, Bhanot R, Mathur P, Bhardwaj N, Singh G, Dinda A, et al. Mice models of obstructive renopathy and location of renal stem cells. Presented at the 30th International Symposium on Pediatric Surgical Research and Update on Newborn and Fetal Surgery (ISPSR). New Delhi; 8th to 10th September, 2017.  Back to cited text no. 11
Sharma S, Gupta DK, Kumar L, Dinda AK, Bagga A, Mohanty S, et al. Are therapeutic stem cells justified in bilateral multicystic kidney disease? A review of literature with insights into the embryology. Pediatr Surg Int 2007;23:801-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
Yokote S, Matsunari H, Iwai S, Yamanaka S, Uchikura A, Fujimoto E, et al. Urine excretion strategy for stem cell-generated embryonic kidneys. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:12980-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
Liao W, Yang S, Song C, Li X, Li Y, Xiong Y, et al. Construction of ureteral grafts by seeding bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and smooth muscle cells into bladder acellular matrix. Transplant Proc 2013;45:730-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
Chan YY, Sandlin SK, Kurzrock EA, Osborn SL. The current use of stem cells in bladder tissue regeneration and bioengineering. Biomedicines 2017;5. pii: E4.  Back to cited text no. 15
Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, Yoo JJ, Retik AB. Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet 2006;367:1241-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
Moad M, Pal D, Hepburn AC, Williamson SC, Wilson L, Lako M, et al. Anovel model of urinary tract differentiation, tissue regeneration, and disease: Reprogramming human prostate and bladder cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Eur Urol 2013;64:753-61.  Back to cited text no. 17
Sharma AK, Bury MI, Marks AJ, Fuller NJ, Meisner JW, Tapaskar N, et al. Anonhuman primate model for urinary bladder regeneration using autologous sources of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2011;29:241-50.  Back to cited text no. 18
Tian H, Bharadwaj S, Liu Y, Ma H, Ma PX, Atala A, et al. Myogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on a 3D nano fibrous scaffold for bladder tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010;31:870-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
Salem SA, Hwie AN, Saim A, Chee Kong CH, Sagap I, Singh R, et al. Human adipose tissue derived stem cells as a source of smooth muscle cells in the regeneration of muscular layer of urinary bladder wall. Malays J Med Sci 2013;20:80-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
Drewa T, Joachimiak R, Bajek A, Gagat M, Grzanka A, Bodnar M, et al. Hair follicle stem cells can be driven into a urothelial-like phenotype: An experimental study. Int J Urol 2013;20:537-42.  Back to cited text no. 21
Yuan H, Zhuang Y, Xiong J, Zhi W, Liu L, Wei Q, et al. Human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells-seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts for reconstruction of bladder defects in a canine model. PLoS One 2013;8:e80959.  Back to cited text no. 22
Kurzrock EA, Lieu DK, Degraffenried LA, Chan CW, Isseroff RR. Label-retaining cells of the bladder: Candidate urothelial stem cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2008;294:F1415-21.  Back to cited text no. 23
Bharadwaj S, Liu G, Shi Y, Wu R, Yang B, He T, et al. Multipotential differentiation of human urine-derived stem cells: Potential for therapeutic applications in urology. Stem Cells 2013;31:1840-56.  Back to cited text no. 24
Zhang Y, McNeill E, Tian H, Soker S, Andersson KE, Yoo JJ, et al. Urine derived cells are a potential source for urological tissue reconstruction. J Urol 2008;180:2226-33.  Back to cited text no. 25
Kajbafzadeh AM, Esfahani SA, Sadeghi Z, Elmi A, Monajemzadeh M. Application of different scaffolds for bladder wall regeneration: The bladder as a natural bioreactor. Tissue Eng Part A 2012;18:882-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
Atala A, Guzman L, Retik AB. A novel inert collagen matrix for hypospadias repair. J Urol 1999;162:1148-51.  Back to cited text no. 27
Mangera A, Chapple CR. Tissue engineering in urethral reconstruction – An update. Asian J Androl 2013;15:89-92.  Back to cited text no. 28
Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S, Atala A, et al. Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: An observational study. Lancet 2011;377:1175-82.  Back to cited text no. 29
Osman NI, Patterson JM, MacNeil S, Chapple CR. Long-term follow-up after tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty. Eur Urol 2014;66:790-1.  Back to cited text no. 30
Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, MacNeil S, Chapple CR. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol 2008;53:1263-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
Nath N, Saraswat SK, Jain S, Koteshwar S. Inhibition of proliferation and migration of stricture fibroblasts by epithelial cell-conditioned media. Indian J Urol 2015;31:111-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Liu Y, Ma W, Liu B, Wang Y, Chu J, Xiong G, et al. Urethral reconstruction with autologous urine-derived stem cells seeded in three-dimensional porous small intestinal submucosa in a rabbit model. Stem Cell Res Ther 2017;8:63.  Back to cited text no. 33
Thaker H, Sharma AK. Regenerative medicine based applications to combat stress urinary incontinence. World J Stem Cells 2013;5:112-23.  Back to cited text no. 34
Chun SY, Kwon JB, Chae SY, Lee JK, Bae JS, Kim BS, et al. Combined injection of three different lineages of early-differentiating human amniotic fluid-derived cells restores urethral sphincter function in urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2014;114:770-83.  Back to cited text no. 35
Carr LK, Steele D, Steele S, Wagner D, Pruchnic R, Jankowski R, et al. 1-year follow-up of autologous muscle-derived stem cell injection pilot study to treat stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:881-3.  Back to cited text no. 36
Mitterberger M, Marksteiner R, Margreiter E, Pinggera GM, Frauscher F, Ulmer H, et al. Myoblast and fibroblast therapy for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: 1-year followup of 63 patients. J Urol 2008;179:226-31.  Back to cited text no. 37
Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW. Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:11298-302.  Back to cited text no. 38
Barnes CJ, Distaso CT, Spitz KM, Verdun VA, Haramati A. Comparison of stem cell therapies for acute kidney injury. Am J Stem Cells 2016;5:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 39
Hübner K, Fuhrmann G, Christenson LK, Kehler J, Reinbold R, De La Fuente R, et al. Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Science 2003;300:1251-6.  Back to cited text no. 40
Ge W, Chen C, De Felici M, Shen W.In vitro differentiation of germ cells from stem cells: A comparison between primordial germ cells andin vitro derived primordial germ cell-like cells. Cell Death Dis 2015;6:e1906.  Back to cited text no. 41
Lue Y, Erkkila K, Liu PY, Ma K, Wang C, Hikim AS, et al. Fate of bone marrow stem cells transplanted into the testis: Potential implication for men with testicular failure. Am J Pathol 2007;170:899-908.  Back to cited text no. 42
Drusenheimer N, Wulf G, Nolte J, Lee JH, Dev A, Dressel R, et al. Putative human male germ cells from bone marrow stem cells. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 2007;63:69-76.  Back to cited text no. 43
Song YS, Lee HJ, Park IH, Lim IS, Ku JH, Kim SU, et al. Human neural crest stem cells transplanted in rat penile corpus cavernosum to repair erectile dysfunction. BJU Int 2008;102:220-4.  Back to cited text no. 44
Nolazco G, Kovanecz I, Vernet D, Gelfand RA, Tsao J, Ferrini MG, et al. Effect of muscle-derived stem cells on the restoration of corpora cavernosa smooth muscle and erectile function in the aged rat. BJU Int 2008;101:1156-64.  Back to cited text no. 45
Valentin JE, Freytes DO, Grasman JM, Pesyna C, Freund J, Gilbert TW, et al. Oxygen diffusivity of biologic and synthetic scaffold materials for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91:1010-7.  Back to cited text no. 46
Sharma AK, Bury MI, Fuller NJ, Marks AJ, Kollhoff DM, Rao MV, et al. Cotransplantation with specific populations of spina bifida bone marrow stem/progenitor cells enhances urinary bladder regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:4003-8.  Back to cited text no. 47
Laschke MW, Menger MD. Prevascularization in tissue engineering: Current concepts and future directions. Biotechnol Adv 2016;34:112-21.  Back to cited text no. 48
Kang M, Kim HH, Han YM. Generation of bladder urothelium from human pluripotent stem cells under chemically defined serum- and feeder-free system. Int J Mol Sci 2014;15:7139-57.  Back to cited text no. 49
Wang Z, Wen Y, Li YH, Wei Y, Green M, Wani P, et al. Smooth muscle precursor cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Stem Cells Dev 2016;25:453-61.  Back to cited text no. 50
Schafer F, Stehr M. Tissue engineering in pediatric urology. Innov Surg Sci 2018;3:107-18.  Back to cited text no. 51
Schäfer FM, Algarrahi K, Savarino A, Yang X, Seager C, Franck D, et al. Mode of surgical injury influences the source of urothelial progenitors during bladder defect repair. Stem Cell Reports 2017;9:2005-17.  Back to cited text no. 52
Gandhi D, Molotkov A, Batourina E, Schneider K, Dan H, Reiley M, et al. Retinoid signaling in progenitors controls specification and regeneration of the urothelium. Dev Cell 2013;26:469-82.  Back to cited text no. 53
Mauney JR, Adam RM. Dynamic reciprocity in cell-scaffold interactions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015;82-83:77-85.  Back to cited text no. 54
Klar AS, Michalak-Mićka K, Biedermann T, Simmen-Meuli C, Reichmann E, Meuli M, et al. Characterization of M1 and M2 polarization of macrophages in vascularized human dermo-epidermal skin substitutes in vivo. Pediatr Surg Int 2018;34:129-35.  Back to cited text no. 55
Garg K, Pullen NA, Oskeritzian CA, Ryan JJ, Bowlin GL. Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials 2013;34:4439-51.  Back to cited text no. 56
Bury MI, Fuller NJ, Meisner JW, Hofer MD, Webber MJ, Chow LW, et al. The promotion of functional urinary bladder regeneration using anti-inflammatory nanofibers. Biomaterials 2014;35:9311-21.  Back to cited text no. 57
Spiller KL, Anfang RR, Spiller KJ, Ng J, Nakazawa KR, Daulton JW, et al. The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 2014;35:4477-88.  Back to cited text no. 58
Ley K. M1 means kill; M2 means heal. J Immunol 2017;199:2191-3.  Back to cited text no. 59
Veremeyko T, Siddiqui S, Sotnikov I, Yung A, Ponomarev ED. IL-4/IL-13-dependent and independent expression of miR-124 and its contribution to M2 phenotype of monocytic cells in normal conditions and during allergic inflammation. PLoS One 2013;8:e81774.  Back to cited text no. 60
Chistiakov DA, Myasoedova VA, Revin VV, Orekhov AN, Bobryshev YV. The impact of interferon-regulatory factors to macrophage differentiation and polarization into M1 and M2. Immunobiology 2018;223:101-11.  Back to cited text no. 61
Bullers SJ, Baker SC, Ingham E, Southgate J. The human tissue-biomaterial interface: A role for PPARγ-dependent glucocorticoid receptor activation in regulating the CD163 +M2 macrophage phenotype. Tissue Eng Part A 2014;20:2390-401.  Back to cited text no. 62
Chen W, Shi C, Yi S, Chen B, Zhang W, Fang Z, et al. Bladder regeneration by collagen scaffolds with collagen binding human basic fibroblast growth factor. J Urol 2010;183:2432-9.  Back to cited text no. 63
Lorentz KM, Yang L, Frey P, Hubbell JA. Engineered insulin-like growth factor-1 for improved smooth muscle regeneration. Biomaterials 2012;33:494-503.  Back to cited text no. 64
Zhou L, Yang B, Sun C, Qiu X, Sun Z, Chen Y, et al. Coadministration of platelet-derived growth factor-BB and vascular endothelial growth factor with bladder acellular matrix enhances smooth muscle regeneration and vascularization for bladder augmentation in a rabbit model. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19:264-76.  Back to cited text no. 65
Kikuno N, Kawamoto K, Hirata H, Vejdani K, Kawakami K, Fandel T, et al. Nerve growth factor combined with vascular endothelial growth factor enhances regeneration of bladder acellular matrix graft in spinal cord injury-induced neurogenic rat bladder. BJU Int 2009;103:1424-8.  Back to cited text no. 66
Deb KD, Griffith M, Muinck ED, Rafat M. Nanotechnology in stem cells research: Advances and applications. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2012;17:1747-60.  Back to cited text no. 67
Alexander A, Saraf S, Saraf S, Agrawal M, Patel RJ, Agrawal P, et al. Amalgamation of stem cells with nanotechnology: A unique therapeutic approach. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2018. doi: 10.2174/1574888X13666180703143219. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 68
Wu H, Tang WH, Zhao LM, Liu DF, Yang YZ, Zhang HT, et al. Nanotechnology-assisted adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) therapy for erectile dysfunction of cavernous nerve injury:In vivo cell tracking, optimized injection dosage, and functional evaluation. Asian J Androl 2018;20:442-7.  Back to cited text no. 69
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Moore T. An artificial bladder. Lancet 1953;1:1176-8.  Back to cited text no. 70
Kaleli A, Ansell JS. The artificial bladder: A historical review. Urology 1984;24:423-8.  Back to cited text no. 71
Sharma S, Gupta DK. Stem-cell therapy for neurologic diseases. J Neuroanaesthesiol Crit Care 2015;2:15-22.  Back to cited text no. 72
  [Full text]  
Jotwani G. National Guidelines for Stem Cell Research. Indian Council of Medical Research & Department of Biotechnology. New Delhi: Published by the Division of Publication and Information on Behalf of the Secretary DHR & DG, ICMR; 2017. Available from: http://www.icmr.nic.in/guidelines/Guidelines_for_stem_cell_research_2017.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Feb 18].  Back to cited text no. 73
Panda A. Tissue engineering and stem cell research in urology: Is the moment yet to come? Indian J Urol 2015;31:87-8.  Back to cited text no. 74
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Thatava T, Armstrong AS, De Lamo JG, Edukulla R, Khan YK, Sakuma T, et al. Successful disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cell generation from patients with kidney transplantation. Stem Cell Res Ther 2011;2:48.  Back to cited text no. 75
Aboushwareb T, Atala A. Stem cells in urology. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008;5:621-31.  Back to cited text no. 76
Atala A. Regenerative medicine strategies. J Pediatr Surg 2012;47:17-28.  Back to cited text no. 77
Lv XG, Feng C, Fu Q, Xie H, Wang Y, Huang JW, et al. Comparative study of different seeding methods based on a multilayer SIS scaffold: Which is the optimal procedure for urethral tissue engineering? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2016;104:1098-108.  Back to cited text no. 78
Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, Chen X, Chandra P, Mo X, et al. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: Anin vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater 2017;50:154-64.  Back to cited text no. 79
Davis NF, Cunnane EM, O'Brien FJ, Mulvihill JJ, Walsh MT. Tissue engineered extracellular matrices (ECMs) in urology: Evolution and future directions. Surgeon 2018;16:55-65.  Back to cited text no. 80
Matoka DJ, Cheng EY. Tissue engineering in urology. Can Urol Assoc J 2009;3:403-8.  Back to cited text no. 81


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

  [Table 1]


Print this article  Email this article


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (933 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Origin of Stem Cells
    Sources of Stem ...
    Cell Based or Re...
    Role of Tissue E...
   Renal Tissue
    Urinary Tract Ti...
    Sphincter Muscle...
    Gonadal Tissue a...
   Cavernosal Tissue
    Contemporary Dev...
    Challenges in Cl...
   Future Directions
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded108    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05