Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:777 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

Table of Contents   
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 150-151

A rare case of transverse testicular ectopia

1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pediatrics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication1-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mrinal Arora
House No. 1057, Sector 16, Faridabad, Haryana
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_143_18

Rights and Permissions


How to cite this article:
Arora M, Kaur J, Kulshreshtha R. A rare case of transverse testicular ectopia. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2019;24:150-1

How to cite this URL:
Arora M, Kaur J, Kulshreshtha R. A rare case of transverse testicular ectopia. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 Mar 6];24:150-1. Available from: https://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2019/24/2/150/253331


Transverse testicular ectopia (TTE) or testicular pseudo-duplication/unilateral double testis/transverse aberrant testicular mal-descent is a rare anomaly in which both the testes descend through a single inguinal canal and lie in the same hemiscrotum. In the literature, less than 100 cases of TTE have been reported.[1] A 9-year-old boy was admitted with the chief complaint of bilateral empty scrotum since birth. He was operated elsewhere at the age of 2 years. As per parents, right-sided inguinal exploration was done, but testes could not be localized. Operative records were not available. When the child presented to us, he had an oblique surgical scar in the right inguinal region. There was no scar in the scrotal region. Scrotum was empty and poorly formed on both sides. Testis was palpable in the right inguinal region and no testis was palpable in the left scrotum or the left inguinal region. Ultrasound of the local region revealed the presence of both the testes in the right inguinal region and absence of any Mullerian structures. The child was posted for right inguinal exploration and bilateral orchidopexy. Right-sided inguinal exploration was done through the previous surgical scar. On exploration, both the testes were found in the right inguinal canal, attached to each other with separate cord structures [blood vessels and vas deferens, [Figure 1]. The testes along with the cord structures were separated. There were thick fibrotic attachments between the spermatic cords. The cords were separated up till the deep inguinal ring. The proximal testis was placed in the right hemiscrotum and the distal testis was placed in the left hemiscrotum, through an incision made in the scrotal septum. It was assured that both the testes reached the hemiscrotum without undue tension. Follow-up with ultrasound at 6 months postsurgery showed both the testes properly placed in the scrotum with good consistency and vascularity. TTE was first reported by von Lenhossek in 1886.[2] The various theories to suggest the etiopathogenesis are-dysfunction of the genitofemoral nerve, true crossover of the testis, both the testis arising from the same genital ridge or both lying in the same processus vaginalis before descent. Management is orchidopexy, either transseptal or extraperitoneal transposition orchidopexy. A search for Mullerian remnants and other anomalies should be done.[3] Laparoscopy better delineates the anatomy and enables us to see the crossing over of the spermatic cord towards the opposite side. It helps assess the testis and its side, vas, and vessels for length. The management depends upon the length of the vas and vessels. If length is severely inadequate, both the testes are fixed in the same hemiscrotum and if the length is adequate, then transseptal orchidopexy is recommended. In cases, where there is inadequate or just adequate length, transseptal contralateral orchidopexy can be done.[4]
Figure 1: Intraoperative picture showing both the testis on the right side

Click here to view

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient's parent has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient's parent understands that his names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Fourcroy JL, Belman AB. Transverse testicular ectopia with persistent müllerian duct. Urology 1982;19:536-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
Von Lenhossek MN. Ectopia testis transversa. Anat Anz 1886;1:376-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
Pandey A, Gupta DK, Gangopadhyay AN, Sharma SP. Misdiagnosed transverse testicular ectopia: A rare entity. Hernia 2009;13:305-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
Raj V, Redkar R, Krishna S, Tewari S. Rare case of transverse testicular ectopia – Case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017;41:407-10.  Back to cited text no. 4


  [Figure 1]


Print this article  Email this article


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (945 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded52    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05