Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
                                                   Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons                           
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 202--206

Preperitoneal bladder augmentation: Feasibility and results


Dhruva Nath Ghosh1, Sampath Karl2, Sudipta Sen3 
1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Pediatric Surgery, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Dhruva Nath Ghosh
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab - 141 008
India

Introduction: Bladder augmentation is an important part of pediatric reconstructive urology. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility and results of our technique of preperitoneal bladder augmentation. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three children underwent preperitoneal bladder augmentation for small inelastic bladders who had failed medical management or needed undiversion. The underlying diagnosis included neurogenic bladder, valve bladder, bladder exstrophy, non-neurogenic neurogenic, ectopic ureters, and urogenital sinus. The operative procedure involved placing the entire augmentation in the preperitoneal or subcutaneous space after bivalving the native bladder. The augment segment of the bowel with its pedicle was brought into the preperitoneal space through a small opening in the parietal peritoneum. A Mitrofanoff port was also provided where needed. Results: Preperitoneal augmentation provided an adequately compliant, good volume bladder except in children with bladder exstrophy or previous abdominal surgery. There was a good cystometric recovery, with resolution of hydronephrosis and incontinence. Vesicoureteral reflux resolved in 24 of 26 units. In the 13 children who were uremic preoperatively, there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine levels, although 9 children continued to have supra-normal serum creatinine. Surgical complications seen were within expectations. There was no incidence of intraperitoneal leak, which is the main projected benefit of this procedure over the traditional “intraperitoneal” method of augmentation. Conclusions: The preperitoneal augmentation provides an adequate, safe, and low-pressure reservoir of urine except in cases of bladder exstrophy and previous abdominal surgery.


How to cite this article:
Ghosh DN, Karl S, Sen S. Preperitoneal bladder augmentation: Feasibility and results.J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2017;22:202-206


How to cite this URL:
Ghosh DN, Karl S, Sen S. Preperitoneal bladder augmentation: Feasibility and results. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Sep 15 ];22:202-206
Available from: http://www.jiaps.com/article.asp?issn=0971-9261;year=2017;volume=22;issue=4;spage=202;epage=206;aulast=Ghosh;type=0