Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:1766 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 115-117
 

Splenogonadal fusion – A rare anomaly


1 Department of Paediatric Surgery, Paediatric Surgery Centre and PG Institute, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Anatomy, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission12-Jan-2019
Date of Decision12-Apr-2019
Date of Acceptance18-May-2019
Date of Web Publication28-Jan-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Priya Santosh Patil
Department of Anatomy, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_6_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rare congenital anomaly. Less than 200 cases of SGF have been documented till date. We present a case of 14-year-old male patient with swelling in the left scrotum for 3 years. Left orchidectomy was done. Histopathology showed ectopic splenic tissue surrounding testicular parenchyma suggestive of SGF. This rare congenital malformation may occur due to the proximity of developing gonad and spleen, resulting in abnormal connection between them during gestation. SGF presents a diagnostic challenge preoperatively; however, recent imaging methods can aid with the diagnosis. SGF as a rare cause of testicular swelling should be kept in mind and evaluated to avoid unnecessary orchidectomy.


Keywords: Orchidectomy, splenogonadal fusion, testicular swellings


How to cite this article:
Patil SV, Patil PS, Sharma VD, Jadhav SS. Splenogonadal fusion – A rare anomaly. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2020;25:115-7

How to cite this URL:
Patil SV, Patil PS, Sharma VD, Jadhav SS. Splenogonadal fusion – A rare anomaly. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 18];25:115-7. Available from: http://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2020/25/2/115/276944





   Introduction Top


Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rare congenital anomaly due to fusion between the spleen and a gonad or mesonephric derivatives. Less than 200 cases of SGF have been documented in the literature. It almost always presents on the left side in males. The diagnosis of this uncommon anomaly is difficult, particularly preoperatively. Certain patients with SGF have undergone unnecessary orchidectomy due to the presence of a testicular lump.[1] SGF is commonly associated with inguinal hernias and other congenital anomalies. We present a case of SGF and discuss its embryological aspects and clinical implications.


   Case Report Top


A 14-year-old male patient presented with a swelling in the left scrotum for 3 years. It was unnoticed till recently when there was a history of trauma. The patient gave no history of pain. On examination, there was left testicular swelling: 6 cm × 5 cm × 3 cm, oval, firm with no redness, and was nontender [Figure 1]. The swelling was free from overlying skin, and the transillumination test was negative. The spermatic cord structures, opposite testis, and penis were normal. There was no other organomegaly. On ultrasonography (USG), the left testis was enlarged and showed a mass with hemorrhage and central focal necrosis. Preoperative differential diagnoses of testicular tumor – benign or malignant and testicular hematoma or torsion testis were kept in mind. Tumor markers – serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) were normal. As the tumor markers were negative, testicular hematoma or torsion testis was considered; hence, a scrotal approach was planned. Intraoperative findings showed considerable congestion of testis. Left orchidectomy was done. On cut section, a dark reddish-brown mass was seen enveloping the testis which showed central areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. The mass was inseparable from the testis as shown in the diagrammatic representation [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. The histopathology report showed the presence of splenic tissue with congestion and hemorrhage surrounded by a capsule. The splenic tissue was present around the testicular parenchyma, which showed focal necrosis. This confirmed SGF of the testis [Figure 4].
Figure 1: Clinical presentation of splenogonadal fusion as left testicular swelling

Click here to view
Figure 2: Intraoperative testicular swelling showing congestion

Click here to view
Figure 3: Diagrammatic representation of cut section of testicular swelling showing testis in the center enveloped by the reddish-brown (splenic) tissue

Click here to view
Figure 4: Histopathology of testicular swelling showing spleen on the lower left side and testicular tissue on the upper right side

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


SGF is a rare congenital anomaly; less than 200 cases of SGF have been documented till date. The genital system develops from the ridge of intermediate mesoderm along the posterior abdominal wall. The germ cells originate in the epiblast, migrate along the primitive streak to reach the endoderm of the yolk sac by the 3rd week and reach the gonadal ridges by the 6th week. At about the 5th week of intrauterine life, the spleen primordium develops within the dorsal mesogastrium in the form of multiple nodules which fuse later.[2] SGF most commonly occurs in males because male gonads are superficial and outside the body.[1] This rare congenital anomaly occurs due to the proximity of developing spleen and gonad-testis during early embryological development, which facilitates their fusion.

SGF is classified into two types – continuous or discontinuous types. In the continuous type of SGF, the gonad is attached to the spleen. The discontinuous type consists of gonadal fusion with an accessory spleen or ectopic splenic tissue. Although classified into two types clinically, there are no significant differences between the two types.

SGF is common in children and adolescents.[1] The number of cases reported in patients <10 years of age accounts for 50% of the total cases reported, whereas patients <20 years old account for 70%.[1]

Our case is an example of discontinuous SGF because there was no cord-like tissue connecting the testis with the spleen, which was in normal position. SGF is most commonly associated with cryptorchidism, unknown testicular mass, or presenting as an incarcerated inguinal hernia. In total, 31% of SGF patients are diagnosed with cryptorchidism or inguinal hernias, and in 59% of cases, the cryptorchidism is bilateral. In cases of continuous SGF, ~50% are accompanied by other congenital malformations.[1] The incidence rate for continuous SGF is higher than that of discontinuous SGF, and most cases are accompanied by limb defect syndrome. Approximately one-fifth of continuous SGF cases also have other major congenital defects such as limb hypoplasia, micrognathia, cardiac defects, palatal defects, and anal defects. Karaman and Gonzales [3] reported a case of both transverse testicular ectopia and SGF. In the present case, the SGF was of discontinuous type and not associated with hernia or any other congenital malformation.

SGF typically presents as an asymptomatic testicular mass and may also present as acute testicular pain and swelling due to trauma or infections of ectopic splenic tissue.[3] In our case, there was a history of trauma which led to the incidental finding of left scrotal swelling. On USG left testicular mass with central necrosis was seen. The mass surrounding the testis was congested and inseparable from the testis, and hence, orchidectomy was performed. The diagnosis of SGF before surgery is challenging as it can mimic testicular tumors. Tumor markers such as serum AFP and beta-HCG can help in such cases. In the present case, both were normal. The lack of awareness of the occurrence of fusion of the spleen with the gonad leads to misdiagnosis. In such cases of testicular swellings, the use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and its role in diagnosis are debatable. Imaging methods, including USG, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 99TCm spleen scanning can be of help in the diagnosis of SGF.[1],[4] The accurate diagnosis can be achieved with the use of recent modalities only if the clinician is aware of this congenital anomaly and SGF as a very rare cause of testicular swelling is kept in mind. If the diagnosis of SGF is made preoperatively, there will be clarity in deciding the mode of treatment. Sometimes, there is no need of surgery or even if surgery is performed, the testis can be preserved. In such cases, laparoscopy and testicle-sparing surgery would be advisable.[5] If the SGF shows no signs of inflammation or trauma leading to congestion, hemorrhage, or ischemic necrosis, the splenic tissue can be easily separated from the gonad, which would help in preserving the testis. However, in cases where SGF is associated with undescended testis, orchidectomy is a better option.


   Conclusion Top


SGF as a rare cause of testicular swelling should be kept in mind and patients with testicular swellings evaluated for the same to avoid unnecessary orchidectomy. The clinicians should also be on the lookout for any other associated congenital defect in such patients.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the legal guardian has given his consent for images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The guardian understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge colleagues, authors, and patient for their cooperation for this case report.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Li WF, Luan MX, Ma Z, Chen YJ. Splenogonadal fusion: Report of four cases and review of the literature. Exp Ther Med 2013;6:816-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bonneau D, Roume J, Gonzalez M, Toutain A, Carles D, Maréchaud M, et al. Splenogonadal fusion limb defect syndrome: Report of five new cases and review. Am J Med Genet 1999;86:347-58.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Karaman MI, Gonzales ET Jr. Splenogonadal fusion: Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 1996;155:309-11.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Li YH. Preoperative detection of splenogonadal fusion by CT. Surg Radiol Anat 2009;31:733-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Papparella A, Nino F, Coppola S, Donniacono D, Parmeggiani P. Laparoscopy in the diagnosis and management of splenogonadal fusion: Case report. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2011;21:203-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,855 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed81    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded10    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05