Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:212 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 106-108
 

Cloacal malformation variant in a male neonate


1 Department of Paediatric Surgery, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Paediatrics, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication29-Mar-2018

Correspondence Address:
Rahul Gupta
Department of Paediatric Surgery, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_118_17

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Cloacal malformation is a rare entity and is invariably referred only to females. We are reporting a very rare case of cloacal malformation variant in a 6-day-old male neonate who presented with absent anal opening along with passage of urine and meconium from an abnormal opening in the perineum.


Keywords: Cloacal malformation, male, neonate, perineal opening, variant


How to cite this article:
Gupta R, Sharma P, Shukla AK, Goyal M, Gupta A. Cloacal malformation variant in a male neonate. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2018;23:106-8

How to cite this URL:
Gupta R, Sharma P, Shukla AK, Goyal M, Gupta A. Cloacal malformation variant in a male neonate. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 15];23:106-8. Available from: http://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2018/23/2/106/228884





   Introduction Top


Cloacal malformation is a very rare entity with a frequency of 1:50,000–1,25,000 new born.[1] It is invariably referred only to females.[2] On the contrary, one of the earliest reported cases of persistence of the cloaca was a male fetus.[3] There are only a few cases of male cloaca reported in the recent literature. In addition, there is a lack of consensus regarding the entity in males and its management.[1],[4],[5],[6] We share our experience with an extremely rare case of cloacal malformation in a male neonate.


   Case Report Top


A 6-day-old male neonate, weighing 2100 g, presented to us with passage of urine and meconium from a single perineal opening along with abdominal distension and bilious vomiting. On examination child was afebrile, mildly dehydrated, and tachypneic. The abdomen was soft and moderately distended and there were visible veins over the abdomen. Perineal examination revealed absent anal opening (without anal pit) and presence of a single midline anterior perineal opening at the proximal part of the scrotum, just distal to the junction of scrotum and perineum [Figure 1]. Urine was seen coming out of the perineal opening along with small amount of thick tenacious meconium. On careful inspection, there was a small cavity underneath the perineal opening; two smaller openings, one anteriorly and other posteriorly placed, were seen in the posterior wall of the cavity [Figure 1]. Testes were bilaterally descended and severe chordee with perineal hypospadias along with penoscrotal transposition was present [Figure 1]. An initial VACTERL workup was done. A left transverse colostomy was performed after preoperative optimization.
Figure 1: Photographs showing single midline perineal opening at the proximal part of the scrotum with small cavity underneath it (a); two smaller openings, one anterior (with Foley's catheter in situ shown by yellow arrow) and other posteriorly placed (black arrow), are seen in the posterior wall of the cavity (b); infant feeding tube placed in posteriorly placed rectal opening and irrigation of the distal colonic loop done to confirm the rectal opening in the common channel (c); bilaterally descended testes, penoscrotal transposition, severe chordee, and perineal hypospadias along with neoanus are seen (d)

Click here to view


The patient was investigated at 8 months of age. Laboratory values revealed anemia (Hb-8.1 g%) and raised total leukocyte count (13,400/mm 3). Chromosomal analysis revealed normal male (XY) karyotype. Internal organs were male; both testes were normal sized and well placed in the scrotum. Distal colostogram revealed rectum tapering before entering into the common channel [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Nonfluoroscopic well-tempered pressure-augmented distal colostogram: Anteroposterior view (a) showing rectum tapering before entering into the cavity along with complete bladder filling; lateral view (b) showing rectum descending below the “I” line; rectum (red arrow) and urethra (yellow arrow) communicating with a common channel (yellow bracket). TC: Transverse colon, C: Colostomy, S: Sigmoid colon, R: Rectum, B: Bladder

Click here to view


Cystoscopy showed a common channel with a length of 1 cm with separately placed urethral opening (anteriorly) and rectal opening (posteriorly). The proximal urethra was normal. There were flakes in the urinary bladder with features of cystitis; ureteric openings were normal. Under general anesthesia, anterior urethral opening in common channel was inspected and bladder catheterization was done. Infant feeding tube was placed in posteriorly placed rectal opening to confirm the rectal opening in the common channel [Figure 1]. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty was performed; common channel was repaired and kept as urethra. The patient did well postoperatively and correction of perineal hypospadias is being planned.


   Discussion Top


The cloaca is a single common channel which is formed at the 3rd week at the tail fold through the confluence of the allantois and the hindgut. Series of events lead to its partition and separation of urinary system, genital tract, and anorectum.[4],[6] Persistent cloaca is conventionally defined as “a single perineal orifice formed as a confluence of urinary, genital, and rectal systems ending in a common channel of varying lengths.”[2],[7] According to Livingston et al., all patients with persistent cloaca are female and have normal ovaries.[7] Most of the surgical literature refers only to females as having cloacal defects. However, there is every chance of the development of cloacal anomalies in males as during embryogenesis; both sexes have to pass through the stage of a cloaca.[1],[4]

Male cloacal variants were defined as a defect in the male with a single perineal opening, in which rectum and urinary tract, with or without vagina, converge into one common channel.[1] Male cloaca was referred as a single opening in perineum for passage of urine and meconium.[5] We define male cloaca as common channel of varying lengths with a single perineal orifice, containing separate openings for the urinary tract (anteriorly) and the rectum (posteriorly).

As per Peña et al., the term posterior cloaca refers to a malformation in which the urethra and vagina are fused, forming a urogenital sinus that deviates posteriorly to open in the anterior rectal wall or immediately anterior to the anus.[8],[9] The rectum is essentially normal or may be minimally anteriorly mislocated.[8],[9] Hendren describes posterior cloaca as rare cloacal malformation in boys.[10] As the common channel in cloaca can deviate anteriorly or posteriorly,[8] thus posterior cloaca in boys as reported by Hendren could be a subset of a male cloacal malformation. The differences in cloacal anatomy are a result of the divergent differentiation of the genitourinary tracts in the two sexes. The spectrum of cloacal abnormalities may result from a partial to complete urorectal septum malformation.[6]

Male cloacal variants may present in the neonatal period and up to 5 years.[1],[5] Late presentation (28 years) has also been reported.[1] Single opening may be located anywhere from anterior perineum to the tip of glans.[1],[5] Length of the common channel ranged from 0.5 to 8 cm.[1] Vaginal remnant (not seen in our case) has been reported in 50% cases of male cloacal variants.[1] Genital abnormalities are severe in cloacal malformation, and proximal hypospadias is a common finding.[1],[5] Renal abnormalities have also been reported.[1]

The differential diagnosis of male cloaca is anorectal malformation with rectourethral fistula (or rectovesical fistula) with proximal (perineal) hypospadias. In males, the spectrum of cloacal abnormalities is difficult to recognize.[4] The presence of common channel should be confirmed by careful visual examination followed up by distal colostogram and cystoscopy.[1] Cystoscopy helps in delineation of fistula tract, length of common channel, and evaluation of urethral and bladder abnormalities. In addition, a search for the presence of any vaginal remnant should be performed.[1]

Colostomy as part of initial management was also performed by other authors.[5] Definitive management consists of either (a) posterior/anterior sagittal anorectoplasty and urethroplasty or (b) posterior sagittal anorectourethroplasty or (c) perineal urethrostomy and anoplasty followed by urethroplasty.[5] Common channel should be preserved at the time of anorectoplasty. This common channel functions as male urethra and is incorporated at the time of urethroplasty. Furthermore, colostomy closure should be undertaken after complete correction of the hypospadias to prevent soiling of the hypospadias repair and also to prevent ascending urinary tract infection due to its proximity to the neoanus. Mortality is not rare (because of associated multiple anomalies).[2]


   Conclusion Top


A high index of suspicion for the presence of common channel should be present in a male patient of ARM with single perineal opening associated with genital abnormalities.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgment

We are sincerely thankful to residents and nursing staff of the Department of Paediatric Surgery, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, for helping in our endeavor.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Banu T, Chowdhury TK, Hoque M, Rahman MA. Cloacal malformation variants in male. Pediatr Surg Int 2013;29:677-82.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Hendren WH. Cloaca, the most severe degree of imperforate anus: Experience with 195 cases. Ann Surg 1998;228:331-46.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Major SG. Persistence of the cloaca: Report of a case. Minn Med 1929;12:96-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Qureshi F, Jacques SM. Cloacal abnormalities in male fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:2046-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Sharma S, Gupta DK. Male cloaca malformation: Rare variant of anorectal malformation. Pediatr Surg Int 2015;31:747-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Wheeler PG, Weaver DD. Partial urorectal septum malformation sequence: A report of 25 cases. Am J Med Genet 2001;103:99-105.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Livingston JC, Elicevik M, Breech L, Crombleholme TM, Peña A, Levitt MA, et al. Persistent cloaca: A 10-year review of prenatal diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:403-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Peña A, Kessler O. Posterior cloaca: A unique defect. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:407-12.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Peña A, Bischoff A, Breech L, Louden E, Levitt MA. Posterior cloaca – Further experience and guidelines for the treatment of an unusual anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1234-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Holschneider AM, Scharbatke H. Persistent cloaca-clinical aspects. In: Holschneider AM, Hustson JM, editors. Anorectal Malformations in Children: Embryology, Diagnosis, Surgical Treatment, Follow-Up. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 201-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (842 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1368    
    Printed67    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded82    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05