Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:1383 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
Table of Contents   
CASE REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 178-180
 

Isolated megalourethra: A rare case report and review of literature


Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication9-Jul-2014

Correspondence Address:
Surya V Prakash
Department of Urology and Renal transplantation, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore-524 002, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-9261.136481

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Megalourethra is a rare congenital disorder of anterior urethra and erectile tissue of penis. It mainly appears in two types-a milder scaphoid type and severe fusiform type. Fusiform type is commonly associated with congenital anomalies of various systems of the body. Isolated megalourethra without other congenital anomalies is extremely rare. We report one such case which was detected postnatally and successfully treated by reduction urethroplasty.


Keywords: Isolated megalourethra, reduction urethroplasty, scaphoid type


How to cite this article:
Mohan CG, Prakash SV, Kumar VV, Babu RG. Isolated megalourethra: A rare case report and review of literature. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2014;19:178-80

How to cite this URL:
Mohan CG, Prakash SV, Kumar VV, Babu RG. Isolated megalourethra: A rare case report and review of literature. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Sep 20];19:178-80. Available from: http://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2014/19/3/178/136481



   Introduction Top


Megalourethra is a rare congenital mesenchymal anomaly of the male anterior urethra characterized by a nonobstructive dilatation of the penile urethra. [1],[2] Nesbitt in 1955 defined it as "a congenital dilatation of penile urethra without distal obstruction". He performed first reduction urethroplasty for this condition. [3] Less than 100 cases have been reported in literature till now. [2],[4],[5] Dorairajan classified congenital megalourethra into two types based on findings of urethrography. [6] The more common scaphoid type with a deficiency of the corpus spongiosum is seen as bulging of ventral urethra. The fusifrom type with deficiency of both corpus spongiosum and cavernosum is seen as circumferential expansion of urethra.


   Case report Top


A 6-month-old male child presented with dribbling of urine with a noticeable swelling of undersurface of penis which increased during the act of micturition. On examination a scaphoid swelling of size 4 × 3 cm was seen on the ventral aspect of shaft of penis which ballooned out during micturition. The child voided from normally placed meatus [Figure 1]a]. Both testes were palpable in scrotum.

On investigation, renal function tests were normal. Ultrasound of abdomen and pelvis showed normal kidneys and bladder with no post void residue. Retrograde urethrogram showed scaphoid dilatation of ventral aspect of distal and mid penile urethra confirming the diagnosis of congenital megalourethra [Figure 1]b]. Cystourethroscopy showed wide saccular dilatation of penile urethra about 1 cm from external urethral meatus. Proximal urethra and bladder were normal.
Figure 1:

Click here to view


A reduction urethroplasty was done through circumcoronal penile incision. After degloving the penis scaphoid dilatation of ventral aspect of penile urethra was noted [Figure 2]. The dilated urethra was incised in ventral midline and the redundant urethra with deficient corpus spongiosum was excised and the urethra was reconstructed over 6 Fr infant feeding tube using 5-0 PDS suture. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. On removal of the catheter after 2 weeks child voided normally without any penile swelling. Regular follow-up at 1 year showed no recurrence of penile swelling with normal voiding pattern and sonologically normal bladder and upper tracts.
Figure 2: Intraoperative photograph of megalourethra after degloving of penis

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The exact embryological cause of congenital megalourethra is not clearly understood. The most commonly held theories propose a defect in the migration, differentiation, or development of the mesenchymal tissues of the phallus. [2] Another assumption is that delayed or deficient canalization of the glandular urethra may be associated with maldevelopment of the corpus spongiosum and corpora cavernosae. [7] Due to the poor development of erectile tissue which normally provides support there will be stasis of urine causing functional obstruction. [7],[8]

Two types of megalourethra are described depending upon the extent of associated embryonic maldevelopment of erectile tissue. Age of detection of megalourethra was between 16 weeks gestation and 24-years-old. [1],[9]

Megalourethra is associated with other congenital anomalies of which genitourinary are most common. Jones et al., in a review identified associated anomalies in 66 of 78 reported cases of megalourethra. [2] In this review, associated congenital anomalies are seen in 80% of scaphoid type and 100% of fusiform type.

The commonly described genitourinary anomalies include renal dysplasia-hypoplasia, hydronephrosis, hydroureter, vesicoureteric reflux, prune-belly syndrome, urethral duplication, megacystis, hypospadias, posterior urethral valves, and undescended testes. Other system anomalies including VATER (vertebral, anal atresia, trachea-esophageal fistula, and renal anomalies) and VACTERYL (vertebral, anal atresia, cardiac, trachea-esophageal fistula, renal, and limb deformities) are described. [10]

In view of associated anomalies, the workup of megalourethra should include renal function tests and imaging of upper and lower urinary tracts. The status of upper urinary tract will determine the ultimate outcome. [1]

Urethral anomalies mimicking megalourethra like urethral atresia, a web, duplication, and a diverticulum are considered in the differential diagnosis. [10]

Prenatally diagnosed megalourethra has to be thoroughly evaluated for associated congenital anomalies and followed up serially by ultrasound for amniotic fluid index, urinary bladder volume, and upper tract dilatation. Termination of pregnancy may be advised in cases with other severe congenital anomalies and renal impairment. In some milder forms of megalourethra spontaneous resolution has been observed in fetuses at 19-34 weeks gestation. [10]

The treatment of megalourethra may be one stage or two stage urethroplasty depending on the age of presentation and general condition of the patient. For scaphoid type, Nesbitt described a longitudinal reduction urethroplasty. [3] Heaton and colleagues described a technique of urethral plication for some cases of scaphoid megalourethra. [11] The management of fusiform type is complicated ranging from sex reassignment to major phallic reconstruction. [2] Long-term follow-up is required in these patients to see for the erectile function and fertility potential. [10],[12] Patients of fusiform type may require placement of penile prosthesis in the adult period. [13]


   Conclusion Top


Congenital megalourethra though rare can be detected antenatally by ultrasound. Management has to be individualized depending on type and the presence of associated congenital anomalies. In isolated scaphoid type of megalourethra reduction urethroplasty gives excellent results as seen in our case.

 
   References Top

1.Hamzaoui M, Essid A, Laabidi B, Ben Attia M, Houissa T. Neonatal congenital mega urethra. Prog Urol 2002;12:680-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Jones EA, Freedman AL, Ehrlich RM. Megalourethra and urethral diverticula. Urol Clin North Am 2002;29:341-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Nesbitt TE. Congenital megalourethra. J Urol 1955;73:839-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Ozokutan BH, Kucukaydin M, Ceylan H, Gözüküçük A, Karaca F. Congenital scaphoid megalourethra: Report of two cases. Int J Urol 2005;12:419-21.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Hazza I, Daradka I. Megalourethra: A case report. J Res Med Sci 2010;17:39-42.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Dorairajan T. Defects of spongy tissue and congenital diverticula of the penile urethra. Aust N Z J Surg 1962;32:209-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Stephens FD, Fortune DW. Pathogenesis of megalourethra. J Urol 1993;149:1512-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Wakhlu AK, Wakhlu A, Tandon RK, Kureel SN. Congenital megalourethra. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:441-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Sharma AK, Kothari SK, Goel D, Agarwal LD, Tamani RN. Megalourethra with posterior urethral valve. Pediatr Surg Int 1999;15:591-2.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Wax JR, Pinette MG, Landes A, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of congenital megalourethra with in utero spontaneous resolution. J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:1385-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Heaton BW, Snow BW, Cartwright PC. Repair of urethral diverticulum by plication. Urology 1994;44:749-52.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Rajendran R, Sasikumar K, Varma RR. Megalourethra. Indian Pediatr 1995;32:119-22.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Olavarria AS, Palavicini MO. Megalourethra with horse shoe kidney. Available from: www.thefetus.net 2004 [Last accessed on 2010 Dec 2].  Back to cited text no. 13
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,374 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1576    
    Printed71    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05