Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:1034 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 218-220
 

Successful separation of Xipho-Omphalopagus twins


1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India
2 Department of General Surgery, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India
3 Department of Plastic Surgery, TNMC and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India

Correspondence Address:
S N Oak
A/11, 404, Neelam Nagar (Phase II), Mulund (E), Mumbai - 400 081
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-9261.40839

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Xipho-omphalopagus twins are conjoined twins sharing some part of gastrointestinal system and lower sternum. These types of twins have best chances of survival if successfully separated. We report a case of successfully separated Xipho-omphalopagus twins, highlighting the importance of proper planning and team effort in such separations.


Keywords: Conjoined twins, omphalopagus, twin separation, Xipho-omphalopagus


How to cite this article:
Oak S N, Joshi R M, Parelkar S, Bhat U, Satish Kumar K V. Successful separation of Xipho-Omphalopagus twins. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2007;12:218-20

How to cite this URL:
Oak S N, Joshi R M, Parelkar S, Bhat U, Satish Kumar K V. Successful separation of Xipho-Omphalopagus twins. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2007 [cited 2019 Sep 20];12:218-20. Available from: http://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2007/12/4/218/40839



   Introduction Top


The separation of conjoined twins poses a unique challenge to pediatric surgeons due to its rarity, complex anatomy and physiology involved. A case of female xipho-omphalopagus twins sharing a common liver was delivered by elective caesarian section. The conjoined nature of the twins was not diagnosed antenatally. One of the babies (Baby A) had a major cardiac anomaly, while the other (Baby B) had a pelvic ectopic kidney. Babies were nursed in ICU and underwent successful separation at 6 months of age. Meticulous planning and complete clinical and radiological workup for the delineation of anatomy ensured a successful separation. The procedure was performed by a team comprising of pediatric surgeons, hepatobiliary surgeon, plastic surgeon, neonatologist and anesthetists. At 10 months of follow up, both the babies are doing well.


   Case History Top


A 30-year-old multipara underwent elective caesarian section and delivered female Xipho-omphalopagus twins and were then referred to our hospital. The combined birth weight of babies was 4.8 kg. The babies were designated as "Baby A" and "Baby B" and shall hereafter be referred to with these names. The babies were fused from xiphisternum to umbilicus and had a single umbilical cord with 3 arteries and 2 veins. The bridge of tissue was firm 5 x 6 cm with palpable bowel underneath [Figure - 1]. The babies were investigated at birth and a decision was taken to defer the separation till the age of 6 to 12 months for adequate weight gain and to provide optimum survival advantage. Investigations were repeated prior to surgery at the age of 6 months.

Investigations

Abdominal sonography revealed the fusion of the livers with other organs being separate. The left kidney of baby B was not visualized. Doppler examination confirmed that the IVC and portal venous systems were separate. Various investigations, including CT scan, MRI scan and Doppler studies, could not give exact anatomical picture regarding the individual extra hepatic biliary tree.

Contrast CT scan and MRI scan of the thorax and abdomen showed the fusion of liver. The differential injection of an intravenous contrast agent into the twins on CT scan delineated the area of overlap of the blood supply and the presence of three cross-communicating vessels traversing the bridge of liver [Figure - 2]. The left kidney in Baby B was ectopically situated in the pelvis. Oral contrast given to one baby (A) confirmed that the bowels were separate. The rest of the organs were found to be normal.

Echocardiography of Baby A revealed a large VSD with bidirectional flow and a small PDA with moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension.

The babies were nursed in the surgical neonatal intensive care for 6 months during which the periodic assessment of babies was conducted, and meetings were held involving pediatric surgeons, hepato biliary surgeon, plastic surgeons, anesthetists, neonatologist, cardiologists and nursing staff in presence of the parents of the twins for the planning of the surgery. At the end of 6 months, the babies had grown to 9.5 kg and the bridge of tissue had increased in size (10 cm). In the viewpoint of the adequate weight gain and the possibility of the increasing pulmonary hypertension of Baby A affecting the other twin, surgery was planned at 6 months of age. Written informed consent was taken with the provision of saving the baby with the better chance of survival in the event of inability to save both of them. A mock drill was conducted a day prior to surgery by the surgical and anaesthesia teams.

The babies were taken for surgery on single operation table with adjacent operation table kept ready for closing the abdomen after separation. Two anaesthesia teams and two surgical teams were allocated to manage each baby. Baby A was first induced and intubated, following which Baby B was intubated.

After preparation and draping, incision was taken anteriorly with a rectangular flap of skin and subcutaneous tissue of Baby B being reflected on to Baby A. The falciparum ligament was divided, peritoneum was opened and liver bridge was defined [Figure - 3]. The bridge of liver was divided with Harmonic scalpel and the bridging vessels were coagulated. The capsule of liver was approximated with horizontal mattress sutures of 2-0 vicryl, tied over haemostatic agent (surgicel fibrillar ).Posteriorly, a rectangular flap of skin and subcutaneous tissue from Baby A was reflected on to Baby B. The fused xiphisternum was divided with scissors. After separation, Baby B was transferred to the adjoining operating room and the abdominal closure was done. Both babies tolerated the procedure well and were extubated on the table and epidural analgesia was used in postoperative period. They were nursed in ICU for 48 h. Baby A was digitalized in view of the cardiac problem. Both the babies were discharged after 1 week. At 6 months of follow-up, both the babies were thriving well with adequate weight gain [Figure - 4]. Baby A weighed 8 kg and Baby B weighed 9.5 kg.


   Discussion Top


Conjoined twins are rare, the estimated prevalence in the literature varies widely from 1:50,000 to 1:200,000, and from the reported cases, around 250 surgical separations have been reported thus far. The largest series reported includes 17 sets of twins by Spitz et al. [1] and 25 sets by Cywes et al. [2]

The separation of conjoined twins presents a unique challenge to pediatric surgeons because of its rarity. Although omphalopagus twins have the best chances of survival, adequate team management and preoperative planning is required in relation to the radiological investigations for the evaluation of the shared organs, presence of anomalies, presence and extent of cross circulation and most importantly anesthesia management. [3] The timing of surgery is controversial; however, a delay of few months gives better chances of survival. [1] Early separation is indicated when one twin threatens the life of the other. [1],[4]

Conjoined biliary tract is reported in 25% of cases of omphalopagus twins. [5]

The routine evaluation of cross circulation is performed using many methods like Tc-99m microcolloidal human serum albumin (HSA),Tc-99m HIDA, [6] injection of indigo carmine and the examination of its excretion in urine of the other twin. One method of evaluating cross circulation is contrast CT scan, [1] which in our case showed a watershed zone in the centre of liver bridge. Some have advocated glucose tolerance test for the evaluation of parasitism. [7] Intravenous fluorescein can be used to demarcate the large liver juncture. [7]

Surgical separation should take the following into account: shared organs, soft tissue and bony defects that ensue after separation, age of the child and associated anomalies. In the absence of associated anomalies, xipho-omphalopagus twins have a better chance of survival.

The outcome of surgery and the long-term survival of the separated twins depend on numerous factors. The previous reports of the infant's death during or shortly after attempting the surgical separation have emphasized the dangers of insidious surgical shock [8] due to adrenal insufficiency and recommended routine use of steroids in postoperative periods. Although major cardiac anomalies are contraindications of separations, variations in the cardiac functions have been observed with otherwise normal hearts. Accurate preoperative investigations, a team approach, previous experience and meticulous operative and postoperative management contribute to the success rate. [6] The outcome is better in twins who do not share vital organs such as the heart or brain and the best results are reported for omphalopagus twins and pygopagus twins without neural involvement. [1]

After separation, there are often large areas devoid of skin; despite the use of preoperative tissue expansion, primary wound closure is not always possible, increasing the risk of postoperative sepsis in these individuals. Tissue expanders and prosthetic patches, i.e., prolene or vicryl mesh, can be used. [9] The long-term survival and outcome in relation to education and psychological outcome in separated twins is good. [10]

The index case thus adds to the overall statistics of successful separation of conjoined twins. [11]

 
   References Top

1.Kingston CA, McHugh K, Kumaradevan J, Kiely EM, Spitz L. Imaging in the preoperative assessment of conjoined twins. Radiographics 2001;21:1187-208.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Cywes S, Millar AJ, Rode H, Brown RA. Conjoined twins-the Cape Town experience. Pediatr Surg Int 1997;12:234-48.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Spitz L, Kiely EM. Experience in the management of conjoined twins. Br J Surg 2002;89:1188-92.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Lai HS, Lee PH, Chu SH, Chen MT, Lin TW, Duh YC, et al. Successful early separation of a premature xipho-omphalopagus conjoined twins: A case report. Can J Surg 1997;40:139,141-2.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Ray AK, Mukherjee NN, Mukherjee G, Patra R, Ghosh DK. Separation of thoraco-omphalopagus siamese twin. Indian J Pediatr 2004;71:755-7.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Rubini G, Paradies G, Leggio A, D'Addabbo A. Scintigraphy in assessment of the feasibility of separation of a set of xipho-omphalopagous conjoined twins. Clin Nucl Med 1995;20:1074-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Kenigsberg K, Harper RG. Separation of omphalopagus twins. J Pediatr Surg 1982;17:255-8.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
8.Chen WJ, Chen KM, Chen MT, Liu TK, Chu SH, Tsai TC, et al. Emergency separation of omphaloischiopagus tetrapus conjoined twins in the newborn period. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:1221-4.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Aird I. Conjoined twins: Further observations. Br Med J 1959;1:1313-5.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.El-Gohary1 MA, Mohyuddin Z, Lakshmi B, Sedaghatian R. Separation of xipho-omphalopagus twins. Pediatr Surg Int 1988;3:76-8.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Votteller TP, Lipksy K. Long-term results of 10 conjoined twin separations. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:618-29.  Back to cited text no. 11    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (58 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Case History
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4278    
    Printed134    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

  2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05