Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:272 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 20-24
 

Blockade of Rennin-Angiotensin system blunts the fibrotic response in experimental acute pyelonephritis


1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029, India
2 Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029, India

Correspondence Address:
M Bajpai
Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-9261.16070

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Aim: To study the impact of Renin-Angiotensin system blockade in experimental acute pyelonephritis, induced by a novel surgical approach via dorsal lumbotomy incision. Materials and Methods : 45 Adult female WISTAR rats aged 8-12 weeks, underwent direct inoculation of 0.1 ml of E.coli suspension into the parenchyma of the surgically exposed kidney. 3 groups of rats were studied: Group A - treated with antibiotics only; Group B- Captopril and antibiotics and Group C- Losartan and antibiotics. Changes of acute inflammation, parenchymal destruction and scarring were compared between the groups on histopathological sections. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. Results : Changes consistent with acute pyelonephritis were seen in all the kidneys. Mean% scar area in Group A, Group B and Group C was 37.08±1.79, 24.40±1.88 and 24.68±1.32% respectively at end of six weeks. Mean tubular density in Group A, B and C was 17.26±1.92, 47.18±3.00 and 47.00±5.08-tubules/lac mm2 respectively. The differences between the control and the treated animals were significant, though the results did not differ between the losartan and captopril treated rats. Conclusions : Dorsal lumbotomy approach to the kidney provides a good exposure of the kidney. Induction of acute pyelonephritis by direct inoculation of bacteria into renal cortex produced a consistent scar at 6 weeks. Blockade of renin angiotensin system by either captopril or losartan decreased the renal scar area by almost 1/3 at 6 weeks.


Keywords: Experimental pyelonephritis; renal scar; renin-angiotensin system; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; angiotensin receptor blocker; lumbotomy incision


How to cite this article:
Singal A K, Bajpai M, Dinda A K. Blockade of Rennin-Angiotensin system blunts the fibrotic response in experimental acute pyelonephritis . J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2005;10:20-4

How to cite this URL:
Singal A K, Bajpai M, Dinda A K. Blockade of Rennin-Angiotensin system blunts the fibrotic response in experimental acute pyelonephritis . J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2005 [cited 2018 May 28];10:20-4. Available from: http://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2005/10/1/20/16070


Acute pyelonephritis may lead to cortical damage and lead to sequelae such as scarring and repeated attacks may lead to renal failure.

Early diagnosis and timely institution of appropriate antibiotics may minimize the scar formation. It has been shown that late institution (> 72 hours) of antibiotic therapy may not prevent the scar formation effectively as the inflammatory response has already set in.[1-4] It is in this scenario that the role of adjunctive drugs to reduce the severity of scarring has been a topic of intense research. Experimental studies have examined the effect of addition of allopurinol,[2] corticosteroids,3],5] anti-oxidants,[6] vitamins,7],8] anti-inflammatory drugs,[9] angiotensin receptor blocker[10] and pentoxiphylline[4] to the antibiotic regimen with some success.

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is important for homeostasis and preservation of renal function in normal state. Activation of RAS, which occurs with nephron loss in an effort to preserve the glomerular filtration rate, proves to be maladaptive in the long run as it also promotes glomerulosclerosis.[11] The present study explores the impact of blockade of RAS of experimental APN.


   Materials and methods Top


Animals

Adult female WISTAR rats aged 8-12 weeks, weighing 150-200 g were chosen for the study. The rats were housed one in each cage in an air-conditioned room at 20șC and fed standard rat chow and Bengal grams. Captopril and Losartan were used in the dose of 10mg/kg/day. The tablets were crushed to yield fine powder and then mixed in drinking water of rats.

Induction of Acute Pyelonephritis

E. coli ATCC 25922 strain was used in colony count of 107-108 for inoculation. This strain is pathogenic to rat and reliably produces acute pyelonephritis in rats.[8] The strain is sensitive to cefotaxime, which was used for treatment of APN.

APN was induced in rats by direct inoculation of 0.1 ml of E. coli suspension into the surgically exposed kidney parenchyma. After ketamine anesthesia the rats were laid prone and a dorsal lumbotomy incision was used to enter the peritoneal cavity. The kidney was delivered out and 0.1 ml of E. coli suspension was injected with a 26-gauge needle in the midpolar region at a depth of 2 mm (Figure 1a and 1b). The kidney was reposited back and the muscles were closed in single layer with 4-0 vicryl sutures. Intraperitoneal Cefotaxime was given for 5 days at the dose of 200 mg/kg once a day, starting 72 hours after surgery.

Grouping of Rats

Three groups of rats were organised

Group A - 15 rats, bacterial inoculum given on day 1.

Group B - 15 rats, Captopril day0, bacterial inoculum on day 1.

Group C - 15 rats, Losartan on day0, bacterial inoculum on day 1.

4 rats from each group were operated at 48 hours and day 7 of bacterial inoculation and 7 rats from each group were operated at 6 weeks post-induction of APN.

Via the previous dorsal incision the right kidney was removed (Figure 1c). The renal capsule was stripped and gross changes were recorded. The kidneys were kept in 10% formalin solution till they were examined histopathologically.

Histopathological Examination

A standard section of kidney was taken vertically through the midportion of the kidney with 5 mm thickness. Sections were examined by a senior pathologist (AKD) who was blinded to treatment groups.

Degree of inflammation, abscess formation, bacterial colonies and the destruction of the pelvicalyceal system were graded on a scale of 1 to 3. At 6 weeks the scar area was evaluated and expressed as percentage of the total coronal area of the whole kidney mount. Tubular density was measured in the scar area to assess the destruction of the renal parenchyma and expressed as number of tubules per lac mm2.

Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis with the significance level (P value) set at 0.05.

Ethical clearance for the experiment was taken from the Institute Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC 192/02) and all the procedures were conducted with sterile precautions and dignity towards animal life.


   Results Top


6 rats were excluded due to premature demise and thus the study was completed with 39 rats. 3 deaths occurred in the immediate post-operative period and were related to anesthesia overdose, the rest of the deaths were unrelated.

The rate of acute pyelonephritis and subsequent scar formation was 100% in the present study, signifying that this experiment yielded a consistent and predictable model of experimental renal scarring.

Changes at 48 hours

There was a discrete whitish focus of pyelonephritis at 48 hours post inoculation corresponding to the site of injection. The involvement often took a confluent linear shape extending along the anterior and the posterior surface to the hilum.

Histopathological examination showed acute inflammatory infiltrate with abundance of polymorphonuclear cells along with microabscesses, bacterial colonies and tubular destruction. There was no difference attributable to treatment with captopril or losartan.

Changes at 7 days

By 7 days the focus of pyelonephritis was slightly elevated over the kidney capsule. The microabscesses were seen in 5 animals only, and bacterial colonies had disappeared in all the animals signifying rapid response to antibiotics. The inflammatory infiltrate at 7 days consisted predominantly of mononuclear cells and lymphocytes implying chronic inflammation.

Changes at 6 weeks

The kidneys at 6 weeks showed characteristic depressed linear scars extending to hilum corresponding to the areas of APN. There was minimal chronic inflammatory infiltrate and there were no bacteria or microabscesses seen. The scar area was expressed as percentage of the total coronal section area (Figure 3).

Mean scar area in Group A, Group B and Group C was 37.08±1.79, 24.40±1.88 and 24.68±1.32% respectively. On intergroup comparisons, the scarring was reduced by 34% in captopril treated rats and by 33% in losartan treated rats when compared to control group (P =0.007). The differences between Group B and C were not significant.

Mean tubular density in Group A, B and C was 17.26±1.92, 47.18±3.00 and 47.00±5.08-tubules/lac mm2 respectively. The differences between the control and the treated animals were significant (P value-0.006) though the results did not differ between the losartan and captopril treated rats. Data of the individual kidneys are presented in Table 1.


   Discussion Top


Renal scarring is a complex multifaceted process characterized by the proliferation of extracellular-matrix producing cells and excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix. Rat model of renal scarring is commonly used and for the induction of APN in rats, both retrograde and direct route can be used. As rats have uniformly 100% congenital reflux, bacterial inoculum into the bladder refluxes into the kidney and leads to APN. But either urethral obstruction for 4-6 hours9],10] or inoculation under controlled pressure and at a constant rate is a must to ensure that this happens.[12] These conditions are difficult to standardize and still the scarring may be patchy.

On the other hand direct inoculation into a surgically exposed kidney leads to a discrete scar at the injection site and produces a more controllable situation.4],8],13] For direct inoculation, midline incision in our experience was associated with more morbidity and even mortality. Our group has been using lumbotomy incision (access to kidney via dorsal incision) for all upper urological tract surgery in children with good results.[14] All these factors prompted us to try dorsal approach to kidney in rats also.

Culture sensitivity based antibiotic (cefotaxime) was given to all the rats starting after 72 hours. Timing of starting the antibiotic is critically important in determining the scarring. It is accepted universally that antibiotic treatment after 72 hours does not prevent significant renal scarring.[1-4] This protocol closely imitates the clinical situation in pediatric UTI as most of the time diagnosis is made late.

The changes seen at 48 hours and 7 days were not significantly altered by administration of captopril and losartan. The damage occurring at this stage is due to acute inflammation and probably both these drugs do not suppress this response.

Histopathological examination at 6 weeks showed wedge shaped scars in all the kidneys signifying consistent results. The reduction in scarring was consistent in all the specimens examined. Lesser PCS destruction was also an important finding. These results signify that renin-angiotensin system is definitely involved in pathogenesis and propagation of scarring in kidney.

Kavakcu et al administered vitamin A to rats in acute pyelonephritis and reported that there was significant reduction in inflammation, tubular atrophy and fibrosis.[8] Huang et al also employed a semi-objective scoring system for scarring in APN and reported significant reduction in scarring with combined use of antibiotics and ibuprufen, though either of the agents alone was not efficacious in decreasing the scarring.[9] Khalil et al reported the downregulation of TGF-beta with use of losartan in experimentally induced pyelonephritis.[10]

In the present study, no significant differences were observed on histopathological level between the control and the treated animals at 48 hours or 7 days. This signifies that the events are occurring at the molecular levels. A further study is planned to elucidate the mechanisms involved therein.


   Conclusions Top


Dorsal lumbotomy approach to the kidney provides a good exposure of the kidney. Direct inoculation of a known bacterial strain into the renal cortex led to a predictable and reproducible focus of acute pyelonephritis, which subsequently evolved into a mature scar over a period of 6 weeks. Pre-treatment with captopril or losartan decreased the renal scar area by almost 1/3 at 6 weeks signifying that the renin-angiotensin blockade helps in decreasing fibrosis. The tubular density in the scar area was more in treated animals signifying less destruction of renal tubules. There was no difference observed in these effects between captopril and losartan implying that blockade of generation of angiotensin or its receptor were equally efficacious in this setting.


   Acknowledgements Top


We are grateful to Dr. Rajbir Singh, Assistant Professor Biostatistics and Dr. Pradeep Yadav, Incharge Animal House for support during the study.

 
   References Top

1.Glauser MP, Meylan P, Bille J. The inflammatory response and tissue damage. Pediatr Nephrol 1987;1:615-9.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Roberts JA, Kaack MB, Baskin G. Treatment of experimental pyelonephritis in the monkey. J Urol 1990;143:150-4.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Haraoka M, Matsumoto T, Takahashi K, Kubo S, Tanaka M, Kumazawa J. Suppresssion of renal scarring by prednisolone combined with ciprofloxacin in ascending pyelonephritis in rats. J Urol 1994;151:1078-80.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Yagmurlu A, Boleken ME, Ertoy D, et al . Preventive effect of Pentoxiphylline on renal scarring in rat model of pyelonephritis. Urology 2003;61:1037-41.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Pohl HG, Rushton HG, Park JS, Chandra R, Majd M. Adjunctive oral corticosteroids reduce renal scarring: The piglet model of reflux and acute experimental pyelonephritis. J Urol 1999;162:815-20.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
6.Haraoka M, Matsumoto T, Mizonoe Y. Effect of ebselen on renal scarring in rats following renal infection. Chemotherapy 1995;41:208-12.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Bennett RT, Mazzaccaro, Chopra RJ, Melman A, Fanco I. Suppression of renal inflammation with vitamin A and E in ascending pyelonephritis in rats. J Urol 1999;161:1681-4.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Kavakcu S, Soylu A, Tirkmen M, Sarioglu S, Buyukgebiz B, Gure A. The role of vitamin a in preventing renal scarring secondary to pyelonephritis. Br J Urol 1999;83:1055-9.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Huang A, Palmer LS, Hom D, Anderson AE, Kushner L, Franco I. Ibuprufen combined with antibiotics suppresses renal scarring due to ascending pyelonephritis in rats. J Urol 1999;162:1396-8.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
10.Khalil A, Tullus K, Bakhiet M, Burman LG, Jaremko G, Brauner A. Angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist (Losartan) down regulates transforming growth factor-β in experimental acute pyelonephritis. J Urol 2000;164:186-91.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
11.Taal MW, Brenner BM. Renoprotective benefits of RAS inhibition: From ACE I to angiotensin II antagonists. Kidney Int 2000;57:1803-17.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
12.Serlachius E, Sundelin B, Eklof AN, Jahnke M, Laestadius A, Aperia A. Pyelonephritis provokes growth retardation and apoptosis in infant rat renal cortex. Kidney Int 1997;51:1855-62.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Slotki IN, Asscher AW. Prevention of renal scarring in experimental pyelonephritis in the rat by early antibiotic therapy. Nephron 1982;30:262-8.  Back to cited text no. 13  [PUBMED]  
14.Bajpai M, Kumar A, Gupta AK, Pawar DK. Lumbotomy approach for upper urological tract surgery in children-an analysis of 68 consecutive lumbotomies. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2004;14:163-7.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]


Figures

[Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]

Tables

[Table - 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Effect of ipsilateral ureteric obstruction on contralateral kidney and role of renin angiotensin system blockade on renal recovery in experimentally induced unilateral ureteric obstruction
Panda, S.S. and Bajpai, M. and Sinha, A. and Mallick, S. and Sharma, M.C.
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. 2013; 18(2): 58-61
[Pubmed]
2 Unilateral ureteric obstruction: Role of renin angiotensin system blockade on renal recovery: An experimental study
Sinha, A. and Bajpai, M. and Panda, S. and Ranjan, S. and Sharma, M.
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. 2012; 17(2): 49-53
[Pubmed]
3 Angiotensin II type 1 (AT-1) receptor inhibition partially prevents the urodynamic and detrusor changes associated with bladder outlet obstruction: A mouse model
Comiter, C. and Phull, H.S.
BJU International. 2012; 109(12): 1841-1846
[Pubmed]
4 Angiotensin II type 1 (AT-1) receptor inhibition partially prevents the urodynamic and detrusor changes associated with bladder outlet obstruction: a mouse model : EFFECTS OF AN AT-1 ANTAGONIST IN BOO
Craig Comiter, Hardeep S. Phull
BJU International. 2011; : no
[VIEW] | [DOI]
5 Vitamin E administration at the onset of fever prevents renal scarring in acute pyelonephritis
Zhina Sadeghi,Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh,Parvin Tajik,Maryam Monajemzadeh,Seyedmehdi Payabvash,Azadeh Elmi
Pediatric Nephrology. 2008; 23(9): 1503
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Vitamin E administration at the onset of fever prevents renal scarring in acute pyelonephritis
Sadeghi, Z., Kajbafzadeh, A.-M., Tajik, P., Monajemzadeh, M., Payabvash, S., Elmi, A.
Pediatric Nephrology. 2008; 23(9): 1503-1510
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
  Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (184 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Materials and me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    Acknowledgements
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6222    
    Printed167    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded184    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer 

 © 2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05